I don’t need an “expert” or a “study” to tell me what I can see with my own eyes. Other than your “glittering generality” argument of their being no evidence to support anything I said, why not take me on point by point and tell me where I’m wrong?
If you read chapter 12 (the article) along with the links at the end of post 1 you might realize the colossal waste of time that would be. The first sentence in chapter 12 is very important.
If you could actually find a credible scientist that supports a single point you've raised then we can discuss that point. The problem is you can't.