Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dragnet2
Otherwise, we would have real border security, without millions crossing in illegally from who knows where, along with tons of drugs, thousands of truck full of human cargo, and Lord only knows what else...All during wartime.

So we agree. The current Bush administration and any hypothetical Ron Paul administration would not do a good job of addressing the war on terror. Thanks.

163 posted on 09/27/2007 5:41:08 AM PDT by the808bass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies ]


To: the808bass
So we agree. The current Bush administration DOES not do a good job of addressing the war on terror. Thanks.

I left out the hypothetical in your post and just left the facts as we know them.

I'm glad to see you agree, I was confident you would...

Even a blind man can see the Bush administration, Congress, the Senate, are not serious about this war on terror.

Otherwise, things would be very different, and our borders would not be chaotic crime zones and a national security bad dream.

And that was the point I was originally trying to make here in the beginning when I responded to a poster suggesting the candidate was not serious about the WOT, when in reality, neither is this current president of the United States.

180 posted on 09/27/2007 9:31:59 AM PDT by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson