You get what you put out. The Paulbots don’t offer any rational civil debate. They merely chant their slogans and talking points. IF they ever tried actually DEBATING instead of filibustering, they might see a big difference in how they are treated.
I was going to say that it’s because the Paulbearers are such wingnuts, but I’ll go with your post! lol
This is very true. If you go back to Paul threads from five or six months ago, they aren't like what they are now. There was actually attempt to debate until we would get 20 paragraph cut and paste pontifications by Paul from articles he wrote for Lew Rockwell or on his site and the constant claim that he is the only real conservative (sic). The real marginalizing didn't come until we started to hear Paul speak at the debates and people started rabidly making excuses for everything he said. That took him out of the candidate column and into the joke of the day column.
The funny part was that they used an old e-mail address I forgot was on here and instead of going to my private e-mail, it went to an e-mail newsgroup on eLearning that I run. This group has over 100 members from around the country and they all saw this as a representative of a Paul supporter. When the Admin of the group e-mailed this person back to ask to please refrain from using that language, the Paul supporter sent them an attacking e-mail.
Paul supporters have far too thin of skin to be playing the political game.
And yet, by calling us “Paulbots”, you show that you are too mean-spirited to rise above petty insults.