[VOA]

Is there not a studio or network out there even slightly interested
in bankrolling an accurate account of anything...or does it
all have to be liberally biased?

Maybe you haven't tried FOX News Channel?

And those wild-and-crazy guys that are
not-fired-only-because-they-actually-have-great-ratings
at CNN Glen Beck and Lou Dobbs?

Yes, liberal, revisionist drivel is the order of the day.

BUT, thanks to competition and "alternate" delivery systems like
AM talk radio and the Internet, truth-tellers have a fighting
chance.
Which is not something I would have felt in the early part of
"The Clinton Years".

And I fondly remember the first days I heard Rush Limbaugh on
radio while I was in an academic lab that was on the cutting edge
of political-correctness.

But for Rush, I'd just thought I was the guy that was going insane then!

Listening to Rush then on the radio...reminded me of poor souls behind
the Iron Curtain tuning in Radio Free Europe/Voice of America
discovering voices of reason/truth...while they lived in the hell
of "a workers' paradise".

Hence my Free Republic Handle of "VOA".

[daler]

Sure...I watch FNC regularly.

And I don't think they're biased at all.

If anything, they tend to buy into the current media "thought-pattern" of the day.

Sure...not as bad as the other networks, but the "conservative" label on FNC is, IMO, not only a bad rap, but a strategy of the left.

I'm talking about plays, movies, documentaries, music videos...other cultural commodities that are now virtually 100% liberal.

Does anybody have any interest in producing entertainment/news fare for normal people?

It would seem to make economic sense.