Replies

This does not rise to the level of constitutional necessity.

BINGO!

15 posted on 09/26/2007 5:59:05 PM PDT by DTogo (I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)

Have a Miller Beerr.

112 posted on 09/26/2007 7:11:55 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)

To: DTogo; arthurus; kingu

If the issue of marriage does not arise to constitutional importance, I don’t know what does.

Guns? You’ve got to be freaking kidding me.

God, Guns, Country. *rolls eyes*

Is marriage going to be a cornerstone of our civilization, or not? Why not just dilute marriage into oblivion. Just float the whole thing.

We’ve already added unilateral divorce, and look where that has taken us. Why even restrict marriage to being between humans? They’re fighting for the rights of chimps in Europe. Why not here, too?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,1784201,00.html

328 posted on 09/26/2007 11:27:37 PM PDT by CheyennePress

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794