Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

$13 trillion deficit looms for Social Security
NY Daily News ^ | 9/25/07

Posted on 09/26/2007 6:18:35 PM PDT by Libloather

$13 trillion deficit looms for Social Security
Tuesday, September 25th 2007, 4:00 AM

WASHINGTON - The Bush administration said in a new report yesterday that Social Security is facing a $13.6 trillion shortfall in coming years and that delaying reforms is not fair to younger workers.

A report issued by the Treasury Department said that some combination of benefit cuts and tax increases will need to be considered to permanently fix the funding shortfall. White House officials stressed that the President is opposed to new taxes.

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said he hoped the new report would help find common ground on the politically divisive issue, but a key Democrat charged the administration will still try to fix Social Security by imposing sharp benefit reductions.

"The administration's new report is a reminder of President Bush's determination to not only privatize Social Security but to make deep cuts in the benefits that American workers have earned," said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.).

"Nobody should be fooled into believing that the only way to save Social Security is to destroy it with privatization or deep benefit cuts," he said. Bush had hoped to make Social Security reform the top domestic priority. He put forward a reform plan in 2005 that went nowhere fast.


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 110th; 13trillion; deficit; ponzischeme; security; social; socialsecurity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
Can't wait until they get their hands on health care...
1 posted on 09/26/2007 6:18:42 PM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather
"Nobody should be fooled into believing that the only way to save Social Security is to destroy it with privatization or deep benefit cuts,"

Stupid idiot. Privatization is the only way to save SS. It's mathematically impossible for it to work any other way. Raising taxes, raising retirement age and reducing benefits just buys time. But the end result is the same.
2 posted on 09/26/2007 6:22:48 PM PDT by Jaysun (It's outlandishly inappropriate to suggest that I'm wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

guess that lock box failed the American people.


3 posted on 09/26/2007 6:24:58 PM PDT by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
They have had chances to stop it or fix it since FDR was in office.

Nothing yet.

4 posted on 09/26/2007 6:25:44 PM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
"Nobody should be fooled into believing that the only way to save Social Security is to destroy it with privatization or deep benefit cuts," he said.

I'm not aware of anyone proposing "deep benefit cuts". It's just a Dem scare tactic.

Privatization is the way to go.

5 posted on 09/26/2007 6:26:26 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The broken wall, the burning roof and tower. And Agamemnon dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
“Can’t wait until they get their hands on health care...”

Frightening indeed!! Is anyone else old enough to remember the pie charts showing how the government kept dipping into SS? For any and every entitlement program? THAT is why SS is in trouble. And it continues today. People who never worked, never paid a cent into the program should not be eligible for SS or title 19, or any other program funded by the SSA.

6 posted on 09/26/2007 6:28:17 PM PDT by gidget7 ( Vote for the Arsenal of Democracy, because America RUNS on Duncan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

I guess that lockbox is full of too much DemoCRAP and not enough money!


7 posted on 09/26/2007 6:32:21 PM PDT by Enchante (Democrat terror-fighting motto: "bleat, cheat, retreat & defeat, we suck on liberal teat")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
No problem; by 2018 the aggregate local state and federal taxes will consume ALL of an average wage earner’s salary. No I didn’t access a website for my information.

Use any three states, the past rate of growth of government and taxes and factor in an average growth for the GDP. No website necessary when one uses the Mark I brain.

8 posted on 09/26/2007 6:32:39 PM PDT by samm1148 (Pennsylvania-They haven't taxed air--yet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

like medicare is such a wonder


9 posted on 09/26/2007 6:32:52 PM PDT by markman46 (engage brain before using keyboard!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Maybe we should turn it over to the UAW to administer?


10 posted on 09/26/2007 6:34:26 PM PDT by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather


It's all because of global warming.

Maybe there's better way to spend our money.

.


11 posted on 09/26/2007 6:37:40 PM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
The Bush administration said in a new report yesterday that Social Security is facing a $13.6 trillion shortfall in coming years and that delaying reforms is not fair to younger workers.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

"Bush lies. The Amuhrican peepull, like Jimmy Jeff here, know that I led the Demukratz in securing their Social Security in a lawk box. If there's a shortfall it's because George Bush picked the lock and stole your Social Security."

12 posted on 09/26/2007 6:38:59 PM PDT by RoadKingSE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
but a key Democrat charged the administration will still try to fix Social Security by imposing sharp benefit reductions.

"The administration's new report is a reminder of President Bush's determination to not only privatize Social Security but to make deep cuts in the benefits that American workers have earned," said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.).

"Nobody should be fooled into believing that the only way to save Social Security is to destroy it with privatization or deep benefit cuts," he said.

That pinhead pisses me off to no end.

I have a privatized SS called a 401K, that I earned, and what it's earned in its short life, surpasses what the SSA says in their statements to me over my entire working life.

If SS was a private account, meaning it was was mine, and not someone else's (like it is now) and thrown into even a simple money market or T-Bill investment; what I have paid into it, and what my employers have contributed, would far exceed what my present 401K is.

Come on Dingy Harry, you know SS is a PONZI scheme, oh wait, you like PONZI schemes, because you're a corrupt democrat.

Privatization is the salvation of SS for future generations. The Charlie Foxtrot the rest of us have to live with, will have to be dealt with, and it will cost, and that will suck. But you had damn well better fix it for the children.

Oh wait, you damn democrats really don't give a damn for the children, only the money they can provide government to give your sorry excuse for of an existence, meaning. At least in your own withered, atrophied mind.

13 posted on 09/26/2007 6:44:20 PM PDT by AFreeBird (Will NOT vote for Rudy. <--- notice the period)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Nobody should be fooled into believing that the only way to save Social Security is to destroy it with privatization or deep benefit cuts

Reid is making a preemptive denial using the only solution for saving SS within his statement. He knows that that is the solution the president has proposed and would make again, and the same solution that will have to be proposed by anybody that wants to save the system. He's just preparing for the inevitable fight that is coming, sooner or later.

The democrats are very fearful that SS will be seen as a failure, which it no doubt is, and that they'll lose it as a political tool in the future. Privatization kills one of their political holy grails, and the retired constituency that they relied on for so long will be gone. The democrats would rather lie to the people than lose on Social Security. But, if the democrats win on Social Security, the American people will be the losers with a completely failed system. Doomsday is fast approaching.
14 posted on 09/26/2007 6:44:36 PM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun
"Nobody should be fooled into believing that the only way to save Social Security is to destroy it with privatization or deep benefit cuts,"

Of course its not the only way to save it. You can reduce it, tax it, tax it some more before you add an increase in the tax we pay...lotsa a ways to save a corrupt unworkable system just STEAL MORE MONEY.

15 posted on 09/26/2007 6:46:46 PM PDT by Archon of the East ("universal executive power of the law of nature")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun

A new plague would resolve all the issues.


16 posted on 09/26/2007 6:48:48 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I don’t want it saved - I want a stake driven through its heart.


17 posted on 09/26/2007 6:49:51 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
We are not planning on collecting a dime of SS money. It will be bankrupt by the time that I am old enough to collect on all of the money that we have put into the system.

We will do just fine on what we have saved and invested. I wonder what is going to happen to those that are depending on SS to sustain them in their “golden years”.

18 posted on 09/26/2007 6:51:17 PM PDT by notpoliticallycorewrecked (Get the U.S. out of the U.N. and get the U.N. out of the U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
WASHINGTON - The Bush administration said in a new report yesterday that Social Security is facing a $13.6 trillion shortfall in coming years and that delaying reforms is not fair to younger workers.

Nonsense. Our Social Security contributions have been safely invested in government IOUs, which are kept in the Social Security Trust Funds. All the Social Scurity trustees need to do is buy more government IOUs.

If there is a shortfall, the trustees can always make up the difference by selling that bridge in Brooklyn.

19 posted on 09/26/2007 6:53:40 PM PDT by Logophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

I’d agree with you but never saw any republican leadership fix it either.


20 posted on 09/26/2007 6:54:25 PM PDT by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson