No question that it “wasn’t his job.” A review of what has happened to other men in similar circumstances might provide understanding why he did it after “doing his job.”
A review of what has happened to other men in similar circumstances might provide understanding why he did it after doing his job.
The UCMJ doesn't judge his actions by what has happened to other men in similar circumstances, it judges him by the rules and regulations that all are expected to obey.
And for the record book I don't like the constraints they are under, but at least I recognize why those restraints are there.