Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Maybe not as well as you think. The oil sands are a different can of worms. There are huge sunken costs associated with producing oil from tar sands and the cost benefit ratio won’t be good if the govt goes ahead with this plan. It’s far cheaper to operate elsewhere, Iraq for instance (in the near future).


14 posted on 09/30/2007 8:26:15 AM PDT by saganite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: saganite

I’ve never been north of Calgary but I’m familiar with development costs of the Fort McMurry projects. Iraq may have cheaper development costs but nobody’s shooting at you in Alberta...


15 posted on 09/30/2007 8:31:53 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Go Hawks !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: saganite

You are right about Iraq. Looks bad now, but in 5 years? Rumor has it that the potential reserves under that country are more than the real reserves under the Gulf/in Iran. I believe this rumor because I heard the same about Mexico in 1960.


19 posted on 09/30/2007 11:14:49 AM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson