To: roamer_1
it’s conservative to be against free trade and national infrastructure?
10 posted on
10/01/2007 2:23:07 AM PDT by
ari-freedom
(I am for traditional moral values, a strong national defense, and free markets.)
To: ari-freedom
After all, “It’s for the national infrastucture.”
“if we could save just one mile, it would be worth it.”
This is kinda fun using liberal mantras.
11 posted on
10/01/2007 2:28:30 AM PDT by
endthematrix
(He was shouting 'Allah!' but I didn't hear that. It just sounded like a lot of crap to me.)
To: ari-freedom
it’s conservative to be against free trade and national infrastructure?Free trade is fine only if it is fair.
Infrastructure is fine too, so long as it does not promote open borders and aid Mexican ports at the expense of our own, not to mention the massive security risk.
13 posted on
10/01/2007 2:47:38 AM PDT by
roamer_1
(Vote for FrudyMcRomson -Turn red states purple in 08!)
To: ari-freedom
"...it’s conservative to be against free trade and national infrastructure?..." When doing so destroys national and state sovereignty, yes. If Mexico and Canada want to become part of the US UNDER THE CONSTITUTION, let'em petition Congress.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson