Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stephenjohnbanker

A question for you Legal Eagles:

I f Rush can show just one small case of loosing a sponsor due to this fraud, isn’t this an open and shut case of defamation?

That would be great theater – suing Reed et al.


86 posted on 10/01/2007 3:10:59 PM PDT by DanielRedfoot (Contrarianism is Creativity for the Untalented)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: DanielRedfoot

I think he certainly has a case against Media Matters, for promulgating the fraud. This wouldn’t be the first time, and he doesn’t have to prove he even lost a sponsor. All he’d have to do is prove that he was slandered and libeled, and it was done with MALICE. Which, of course, it was.

Unfortunately, Tom Harkin and Harry Reid pretty much have immunity for anything they say within the confines of “debate” in the Senate.

Can someone tell me what state Harkin comes from?


89 posted on 10/01/2007 3:17:15 PM PDT by Right Cal Gal (Remember Billy Dale!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson