[drpix]

"Artwork is usually the refuge of those who are incapable of engaging in constructive debate."

Ha! Paulistinian true believers are immune to truth by debate. I use whatever is needed to expose the disinformation and debunk the naive and half baked ideas of the Ron Paul Revolution. If they have to be cornered, I use words. If they have to ridiculed... you must admit nothing beats graphics for ridicule.

[drpix]

As to the points in the graphics, if you like, you can start with the following questions from a Ron Paul perspective:

- If Jihadist Terrorists attacked the US because we are in the Middle East, didn't Japan attack us because we had colonies in Asia and the Pacific (Philippines & Hawaii)?

- How does 3,000 Americans dying from the Pearl Harbor attack, justify a war costing the US 500,000 dead soldiers/sailors? And how many Americans died on American roads in 1940?

- Where in the RP Constitution does it provide for the Moon Landing?

- The French Vichy government never attacked us, why did we invade France? ( Ditto North Africa & Italy ) Did more French die before D-day or after?

[SJackson]

"Artwork is usually the refuge of those who are incapable of engaging in constructive debate."

Of course Ron Paul artwork placed on public or private property without authorization is grafitti, I'd call it littering so as to not insult grafitti artists.

Unlawful in either case.

The signs mane on Ron Paul day linked above, were they all prepared only for private citizens to be placed on their own property?

I know, Ron Paul has nothing to do with this either. The clueless candidate.