Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Free Trade Treaties Mean Impoverishment
The Wall Street Journal ^ | October 4, 2007 | Bernie Sanders

Posted on 10/04/2007 3:17:09 AM PDT by 1rudeboy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: ReleaseTheHounds
I think we’re saying the same thing. Mencken just said it better.

Gogos: a herdsman. Hence “pedagogue”, a slave employed to shepherd children and “demagogue”, one who herds people.

21 posted on 10/04/2007 5:20:19 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (NYT Headline: Protocols of the Learned Elders of CBS: Fake but Accurate, Experts Say)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
softwood lumber dispute with Canada over the last five years

Five years? More like on and off for several decades. Disputes should to be expected when a trading partner can produce and basically dump large quantities of a product into a market which cannot compete because the economic overhead costs are much higher.

22 posted on 10/04/2007 5:36:22 AM PDT by Realism (Some believe that the facts-of-life are open to debate.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Point taken.

And given the disparity between federally mandated benefits, environmental, and labor law burdens -- I would have to say that the US is nuts to sign on to free trade arrangements with most of the developing nations in this world.

Does'nt apply to Canada, of course, since the goobermint shackles on Canadian capitalists are probably more intense than those here in the "land of the free."

I do find it ironic that the socialist Sanders whines about the "destruction" of Meh-hico's agricultural business to "cheap US imports." If this nimrod would secure our border and deport the cheap labor enjoyed by Archer Daniels Midland, Swift, General Mills, etc., the Meh-hiccan citizens here would go back to their native land and do what they doing 30 years ago -- farming for their patron and barely getting by.

23 posted on 10/04/2007 6:32:08 AM PDT by L,TOWM ("Protesting Clinton's wars was'nt cool..." - Jeneane Garafolo, 2003)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ReleaseTheHounds; 1rudeboy; Mase
"The demagogue is one who preaches doctrines he knows to be untrue to men he knows to be idiots."

Sounds like Corsi.

24 posted on 10/04/2007 6:32:46 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Ignorance of the laws of economics is no excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Speaking of socialists (and economics), anyone else getting a chuckle over this whole Media Matters issue?


25 posted on 10/04/2007 7:02:34 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Speaking of socialists (and economics), anyone else getting a chuckle over this whole Media Matters issue?

Were some of our favorite True ConservativesTM using them for a source?

26 posted on 10/04/2007 7:14:02 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Ignorance of the laws of economics is no excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Not recently. After this, hopefully never.


27 posted on 10/04/2007 7:22:47 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
I wouldn’t bet big money on that.
28 posted on 10/04/2007 7:45:17 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Ignorance of the laws of economics is no excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
“Countries” don’t trade, individuals do.

Worth repeating -- I wish more people understood that.

29 posted on 10/04/2007 7:45:36 AM PDT by BfloGuy (It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker, that we can expect . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Free Trade Treaties Mean Impoverishment

That can't be true. Just look at how rich the average Mexican peasant has gotten since NAFTA.
30 posted on 10/04/2007 7:49:35 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mysterio

You may see NAFTA as a jobs program for Mexican peasants, I do not. I’d rather concern myself with American workers.


31 posted on 10/04/2007 8:02:18 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: mysterio

Feelings, whoa whoa whoa feelings.


32 posted on 10/04/2007 8:03:26 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Ignorance of the laws of economics is no excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

You evil exploiter.


33 posted on 10/04/2007 8:03:51 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Ignorance of the laws of economics is no excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Do you have any data on Mexican per capita income at your fingertips? Over time? I may look it up later, if I’m bored.


34 posted on 10/04/2007 8:06:33 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

No.


35 posted on 10/04/2007 8:09:42 AM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Ignorance of the laws of economics is no excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
You may see NAFTA as a jobs program for Mexican peasants

Not so much.
36 posted on 10/04/2007 8:35:30 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson