Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jonathan Turley Reads Constitution, Is Shocked to Find 2nd Amendment
Leibowitz's Canticle ^ | October 4, 2007 | Leibowitz

Posted on 10/04/2007 7:53:04 AM PDT by Bob Leibowitz

Jonathan Turley, a very high profile constitutional scholar and dedicated liberal, this morning confessed to reading the Constitution and finding within its black letters a previously undiscovered 2nd Amendment. To Turley's chagrin and credit, he acknowledges his discovery in today's op-ed piece A Liberal's Lament: The NRA Might Be Right After All

***

Like many academics, I was happy to blissfully ignore the Second Amendment. It did not fit neatly into my socially liberal agenda. Yet, two related cases could now force liberals into a crisis of conscience. The Supreme Court is expected to accept review of District of Columbia v. Heller and Parker v. District of Columbia, involving constitutional challenges to the gun-control laws in Washington.

His most compelling lines form the most compelling argument in favor of the Second Amendment meaning exactly what it says:

More important, the mere reference to a purpose of the Second Amendment does not alter the fact that an individual right is created. The right of the people to keep and bear arms is stated in the same way as the right to free speech or free press.

RELATED LINKS: The Most Important Gun Rights Court Decision… Ever!

What on Earth Are D.C. City Politicians Smoking? Hallucinating About Gun Control in Parker

(Excerpt) Read more at Canticle4Leibowitz.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: banglist; constitution; guncontrol; heller; jonathanturley; parker; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

1 posted on 10/04/2007 7:53:07 AM PDT by Bob Leibowitz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

***Like many academics, I was happy to blissfully ignore the Second Amendment.***

I wouldn’t call them academics.


2 posted on 10/04/2007 7:55:13 AM PDT by wastedyears (George Orwell was a clairvoyant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

Yet he’s always on Fox (or was).

At least Fox doesn’t let the third rate hack (and former participator in this forum) Jeffrey Toobin on.


3 posted on 10/04/2007 7:55:13 AM PDT by sauropod ("Nobody has time for your priceless prose. Get to the point." - Jim Michaels RIP 2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz
Ah, yes. The Bill of Rights

Of The People, by The People, for The People....all of the amendments...except THAT ONE!!

4 posted on 10/04/2007 7:57:10 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

‘Sokay... lots of people on *both* sides forget the 10th Amendment is there, too.


5 posted on 10/04/2007 8:00:39 AM PDT by Terabitten (Virginia Tech Corps of Cadets - E-Frat '94. Unity and Pride!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz
A Liberal's Lament
6 posted on 10/04/2007 8:00:44 AM PDT by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz
More important, the mere reference to a purpose of the Second Amendment does not alter the fact that an individual right is created. The right of the people to keep and bear arms is stated in the same way as the right to free speech or free press.

No right is created; it already exists. The Bill of Rights is intended to protect those preexisting and inalienable rights.

7 posted on 10/04/2007 8:02:31 AM PDT by Logophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

Harry and Nancy are saddened...and deeply concerned.

Jonathan Turley will be the next victim on the moonbat hit list.


8 posted on 10/04/2007 8:02:44 AM PDT by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

shazzam!


9 posted on 10/04/2007 8:05:38 AM PDT by Ikemeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Logophile
No right is created; it already exists. The Bill of Rights is intended to protect those preexisting and inalienable rights.

Yes and all of our rights are given to us by our Creator.

It's in the Declaration of Independence.


10 posted on 10/04/2007 8:07:19 AM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (you shall know that I, YHvH, your Savior, and your Redeemer, am the Elohim of Ya'aqob. Isaiah 60:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Terabitten

Well that kinda asks one question: What belongs to the people? (in terms of responsibility)


11 posted on 10/04/2007 8:08:05 AM PDT by wastedyears (George Orwell was a clairvoyant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

bump


12 posted on 10/04/2007 8:08:32 AM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (you shall know that I, YHvH, your Savior, and your Redeemer, am the Elohim of Ya'aqob. Isaiah 60:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

bttt


13 posted on 10/04/2007 8:14:42 AM PDT by JamesP81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz
More important, the mere reference to a purpose of the Second Amendment does not alter the fact that an individual right is created.

Beware this poison pill mischaracterization. No rights are "created" by the Constitution or Bill of Rights. They are simply guaranteed, and in some instances, but not all, specified.

While it may be true that this "legal expert" has seen the light, it could also be a case of laying the groundwork for repealing the Second Amendment should the SCOTUS rule unfavorably, i.e. correctly.

14 posted on 10/04/2007 8:15:04 AM PDT by tarheelswamprat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears
Well that kinda asks one question: What belongs to the people? (in terms of responsibility)

Everything not specifically granted to the government.

15 posted on 10/04/2007 8:16:05 AM PDT by Terabitten (Virginia Tech Corps of Cadets - E-Frat '94. Unity and Pride!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz; Joe Brower

Bang!


16 posted on 10/04/2007 8:21:13 AM PDT by EdReform (The right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed *NRA*JPFO*SAF*GOA*SAS*RWVA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

IBrp


17 posted on 10/04/2007 8:21:48 AM PDT by Hazcat (We won an immigration BATTLE, the WAR is not over. Be ever vigilant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

How is it that liberals believe that the 2nd amendment and only the 2nd amendment empowers the government while all others empower the individual.


18 posted on 10/04/2007 8:25:31 AM PDT by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

“a very high profile constitutional scholar”???? How could this be if he never read the 2nd Ammendment?


19 posted on 10/04/2007 8:27:55 AM PDT by RC2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Leibowitz

What happened, the guy got mugged?


20 posted on 10/04/2007 8:29:50 AM PDT by 109ACS (Humpty Dumpty was pushed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson