If the site was a smithy there should be a great deal more evidence on the site than one copper chisel.
This may be a poor translation or the archaeologist may have a poor grasp of English but a scientist saying we want to prove bothers me. Perhaps it would be better to say we expect to prove or it is our hypothesis that this site was a metal works centre in the central part of the Balkans.
I know it is anal of me:)
someone dropped a cheap copper chisel into an old post hole, and 75 years later, someone digs it up.
Not at all. The "we want to prove" is a tactic used by some of the current "scientists" working on things such as global warming. It is contrary to a scientific approach.