Posted on 10/04/2007 9:00:06 AM PDT by presidio9
One word. Medication.
Nice courage at the Nation — no byline.
I get a kick out of the damnation that he won’t ask questions or grant many interviews and then when he writes a book giving all the back ground information that the ink-whores could want, he is still damnned.
After Bill Clinton, the Left has lost the authority to ever again MENTION sexual harassment.
Liberals are losers.
They are also whiners.
What’s sweet about this story is that Thomas can make them whine about a 16 year old loss.
Nominating conservatives to the bench is one thing, but getting confirmation is yet another. For whatever reason, Republicans in Congress don’t have the fight in them that the Democrats do. With the support of the MSM, the Democrats will control future appointments unless something changes.
No, I call it what it is, an advance. It can't be a "gift" if it's for "services rendered." What an idiotic assertion.
I wonder if The Nation had their panties in a twist when Hillary got an $8 million advance from Simon & Schuster, which is based in New York.
And how did The Nation feel about the book by Clinton appointee Justice Stephen Breyer? ("Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution")
Going by The Nations logic, shouldnt Breyer recuse himself from any cases dealing with Democracy?
http://www.easybourse.com/Website/dynamic/News.php?NewsID=214715&lang=fra&NewsRubrique=2&pageliste=3
I bought this book on Monday morning at the Borders on the corner of Broadway and Wall Street. That morning it was displayed prominently on top of the table by the front door. It just so happened that I also bought a book for my nephew, which I had to return yesterday. Yesterday, Justice Thomas' book was nowhere to be seen. I spent a while looking for it, and I finally found it underneath the same table, and in the back, away from the door. The spot that it formerly occupied was now taken by Bill Clinton's book on charity. Above Justice Thomas' book, on top of the table in the back, was Jimmuh's book on who know (and who cares) what. This is par for the course for NYC liberals who can't do better than minimum wage jobs. It's too bad for Borders, of course, because the newest book, which is currently appearing on 60 minutes and Hannity is going to be the hottest seller. I thought about pointing this out to the manager, but then decided to spare myself the attitude and the aggravation. If these liberal bookstores insist on driving customers to the internet, just like the dinosaur media before them, that's their problem, not mine.
I hope Ruth Buzzi recuses herself any time the ACLU files a brief.
Hillary Clinton received an $8million advance from Viacom's Simon & Schuester in the brief window between the time she was elected and the time she was sworn in, neatly avoiding any "conflict of interest" in accepting such payment as a sitting senator.
Hillary Clinton Book Advance, $8 Million, Is Near Record (NY Times Published: December 16, 2000)
The writer of this article needs to lean back now and then and wipe the froth from his quivering lips.
Clarence Thomas had the wrong political view on Abortion.
Bill Clinton has the correct political view on Abortion.
Rape, sexual harassment, get oral sex from an aide, etc. were not an issue to NOW. Abortion was.
Do these jerks really want to open this can of worms?
From the article: “makes you wonder: how come none of the presidential candidates have said a word about the Supreme Court in any of their debates?”
One has.
Duncan Hunter.
Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA) declared that judicial nominees should be given a sonogram test before being confirmed. If we have a judicial applicant who can look at a sonogram of an unborn child and not see the value of human life, then he will not receive a judicial appointment, Hunter announced. I tell you what you he will receive, he will get an appointment with an optometrist so he can get a pair of eye glasses.
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/01/23/hunter-sonogram/
You are welcome to get your useless Duncan Hunter plug in if you like, but all of the Republican candidates have talked about SCOTUS justices quite a bit. As a matter of fact, it was a debate question.
? I saw several copies of this book on sale in San Jose Airport om Friday September 28th.
So The Nation is engaging in a fairly low tech lyniching of an uppity black man.
Do your homework, you lazy excuse for a reporter.
State laws empower sitting or retired Justices to perform wedding ceremonies.
Journa-twit !
Leni
Leni
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.