(Clarence) "Thomas Derangement Syndrome" was/is a precursor to "Bush Derangement Syndrome."
1 posted on
10/04/2007 11:07:37 AM PDT by
Pyro7480
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
To: Pyro7480
TOOBIN: Hillary Clinton...shes no radical. She supports the death penalty. Not that you asked, but if Hillary Clintons president, I think shell appoint Barack Obama to the Supreme Court. [Rosen laughs.] Its no joke, absolutely.
YEAH..you bet she supports the death penatly...particularly for anyone that might get in her way.
To: Pyro7480
3 posted on
10/04/2007 11:12:04 AM PDT by
johnny7
("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")
To: Pyro7480
"Temperament, personality matter. Its the fact that Thomas is so angry...the fact that he cant get over this wound, this indignity, that hes always been so angry, that makes him more radical than people who are essentially ofthe same ideology like Scalia or even Roberts. This is an example of someone undone by his temperament." Hmmmmm...somehow this problem doesn't undo all of those perpetually outraged black politicians on the Left though, does it? ;)
4 posted on
10/04/2007 11:12:06 AM PDT by
Mr. Jeeves
("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
To: Pyro7480
Does anyone actually believe Justice Scalia would call Justice Thomas “a nut,” let alone IN PUBLIC! Such an utterance by Scalia would do more to discredit himself. [by the way the two justices seem to be friends of some degree. Scalia’s son, who became a priest, helped Thomas decide to return to the Catholic Church.]
To: Pyro7480
Nobody thinks more highly of Toobin than Toobin.
6 posted on
10/04/2007 11:15:14 AM PDT by
Doctor Raoul
(Columbia = Ayatollah U.)
To: Pyro7480
7 posted on
10/04/2007 11:15:29 AM PDT by
God luvs America
(When the silent majority speaks the earth trembles!)
To: Pyro7480
He also predicted that if elected president, Hillary Clinton would nominate Barack Obama to the Supreme Court, a "political masterstroke" for Hillary since Obama would be an "unassailable nominee." Besides Barack being an idiot and having no business to be on the court, he is not liberal enough for Clinton to nominate.
To: Pyro7480
At the end of the hour, a caller from Hillarys adopted area of Westchester, New York worried strangely that Thomas had returned to a " a fundamentalist, Calvinistic form of Roman Catholicism." (Calvinism and Catholicism are rarely confused as synonymous.) Unless you look at the writings of Augustine
9 posted on
10/04/2007 11:16:09 AM PDT by
Uri’el-2012
(you shall know that I, YHvH, your Savior, and your Redeemer, am the Elohim of Ya'aqob. Isaiah 60:16)
To: Pyro7480
Toobin is a legend in his own mind. He’s a CNN whore, so his opinion is automatically discredited.
To: Pyro7480
Justice Thomas believes that much of the New Deal is unconstitutional. These people are deranged. A lot of the Justices back in the 30 also thought much of the New Deal was unConstitutional. That's why they struck a lot of it down until FDR cowed them down when he tried to pack the court.
11 posted on
10/04/2007 11:22:07 AM PDT by
7thson
(I've got a seat at the big conference table! I'm gonna paint my logo on it!)
To: Pyro7480
TOOBIN: Hillary Clinton...shes no radical. She supports the death penalty. Anyone see Vince Foster, perhaps he'd like to give us first hand info............
15 posted on
10/04/2007 11:23:05 AM PDT by
rockabyebaby
(HEY JORGE, SHUT UP AND BUILD THE BLEEPING FENCE, ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS.)
To: Pyro7480
Seems extremely odd that Toobin wouldn’t answer yes or no as to whether he had interviewed Thomas. He would know the answer, and not much point in trying to cover up the reality.
16 posted on
10/04/2007 11:23:24 AM PDT by
Williams
To: Dr. Eckleburg; blue-duncan
Thomas had returned to a " a fundamentalist, Calvinistic form of Roman Catholicism." (Calvinism and Catholicism are rarely confused as synonymous.)
A devotee of Augustine??
19 posted on
10/04/2007 11:29:26 AM PDT by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
To: Pyro7480
23 posted on
10/04/2007 11:31:13 AM PDT by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: Pyro7480
So Toobin too is attempting a high tech lyniching of an uppity black man.
he should be ashamed of himself.
24 posted on
10/04/2007 11:31:25 AM PDT by
NeoCaveman
(Fred Thompson 2008, no need to "suspend disbelief" with him)
To: Pyro7480
Calvinistic form of Roman Catholicism?
Is that like an ‘oily form of vinegar’?
2 things so far apart they can never be mixed.
25 posted on
10/04/2007 11:32:33 AM PDT by
truemiester
(If the U.S. should fail, a veil of darkness will come over the Earth for a thousand years)
To: Pyro7480
Justice Thomas believes that much of the New Deal is unconstitutionalWhat a coincidence, so do I!
As for B Hussein Obama on the Supreme Court - thanks, I needed a laugh today.
26 posted on
10/04/2007 11:33:44 AM PDT by
Rummyfan
(Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
To: Pyro7480
I was at a synagogue where Justice Scalia was giving a speech not too long ago and someone asked him to compare your judicial philosophy and Justice Thomass, and he talked for a while, and he said, well, look, Im a textualist. Im an originalist, but Im not a nut. And I think that sums up a little bit the difference between the two. Justice Thomas believes that much of the New Deal is unconstitutional. Justice Scalia doesnt. I call BS. There's lots I don't like about Scalia but he has to know that all of the New Deal programs except Social Security were eventually declareded unconstitutional by the Court itself.
ML/NJ
32 posted on
10/04/2007 11:41:34 AM PDT by
ml/nj
To: Pyro7480
37 posted on
10/04/2007 12:08:22 PM PDT by
WOSG
(I just wish freepers would bash Democrats as much as they bash Republicans)
A scholar and legend in his own mind.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson