Do I think he is a homosexual? Probably. Could I prove it? No. And neither can you! He pleaded guilty to Disturbing the Peace .. that's it! Anything else is just speculation on your part. I believe he was there to find sex .. but there is no proof. Until there is proof, he is innocent. If you can't handle that .. then you don't believe in our Constitution .. and you can take that Kool-Aid and swallow it!
He pled guilty to a lesser offense to avoid being charged with deviant behavior.
He isn't 'innocent' of anything-he pled guilty.
And the next time you use a restroom and and someone touches your feet you can just assume he has a 'wide stance'.
The Constitution doesn't defend deviant behavior.
So, enjoy your kool aid.
The court dismissed a charge of gross misdemeanor interference to privacy. There was NEVER a charge of "deviant behavior". You cannot just make up stuff.
He isn't 'innocent' of anything-he pled guilty.
I said: "I believe he was there to find sex .. but there is no proof." You need to understand that what I *think* and what you *think* does not matter to the judge. Craig never admitted he was there for sex, and he was never charged with being there for sex. He pled guilty to Distubance and thats all.
I needed to make the distinction of what I *believed" happened .. and what could be *proven*. You need to do the same. And these charges of "Deviant Behavior" that you dreamed up, doesn't help your credibility.
And the next time you use a restroom... blah blah blah
Don't make it personal. Don't insert ME into some "what if" scenario. This is not about ME.
The Constitution doesn't defend deviant behavior.
No it doesn't .. and I NEVER claimed it did! Do you always just make stuff up?
What the Constitution DOES SAY, is that we are innocent until proven guilty. Guess you missed that part. Enjoy the kool-aid.