[elfman2]

"ID is disproved in any system for which there is no bias."

According to you, the criteria for evolution to be scientific is that it must have a “published specific peer-reviewed” falsification criteria - which I showed was not the standard for all other scientific theories and invited you to show otherwise. You refused to even address it.

But you say the criteria for ID be scientific is just that God’s an answer for “any system” which you think ”there is no basis”. One bar ridiculously high, one bar absurdly low - equals one pathetic appearance on FR today.

ASA Vet’s right, enough time’s been spent on this. Regards…

[Southack]

"But you say the criteria for ID be scientific is just that God’s an answer for “any system” which you think ”there is no basis”."

ID is not dependent on God. Any intelligence could suffice.

This is why Intelligent Design explains, scientifically, all modern transgenic animals such as pigs that have their DNA modified such that they grow human hormones in our labs.

Evolutionary Theory fails to explain those sorts of transgenic animals, by the way...