Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ClearCase_guy
Science has been pretty much defined in such a way so that only physical aspects of the natural world qualify as science.

That's kind of why they call them the natural sciences. How would transcendant, supernatural topics be covered in science class?

As to the bringing back of religion class, I wholeheartedly agree. It was part of my education, and I do believe that western civilization cannot be adequately understood without knowledge of our religous heritage.

The above comment made by a non-repentant "evolutionist", which around here is pretty much synonymous with commie pinko fag atheist hippie monkey boy supporter of public breastfeeding with a side order of total anarchy.

207 posted on 10/05/2007 11:06:05 AM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: dmz
non-repentant "evolutionist", which around here is pretty much synonymous with commie pinko fag atheist hippie monkey boy supporter of public breastfeeding with a side order of total anarchy.

Now THAT would make a great tagline!

209 posted on 10/05/2007 11:10:59 AM PDT by Squawk 8888 (Is human activity causing the warming trend on Mars?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson