Prosecutor says Danny Bonaduce won't be charged after 'Survivor' incident

The Canadian Press ^ | 10/05/07 | canadian press

[HANG THE EXPENSE]

When did you get cut?

[IronJack]

That limp-wristed poofter used to be a wrestler? What’d he wrestle, butterflies?

[Grizzled Bear]

“Danny Bonaduce’s response went too far.”

Sure it is until it happen to you.

---

After putting the perv’s nose into the stage floor Bonaduce refrained from planting the toe of his shoe into the fore mentioned perv’s ribs.

He showed great restraint and behaved like a gentleman. Mrs Partridge should be very proud.

[Jorge]

What’s the rational response, Jorge? Stand there and “take it like a man?” LOL

Maybe you think so, but I said he was right to get the creep off him.
But of course actually reading posts before you respond is too much to expect isn't it....

[Jorge]

After putting the perv’s nose into the stage floor Bonaduce refrained from planting the toe of his shoe into the fore mentioned perv’s ribs.

Of course.
As it is he was almost charged with assault.

Defending oneself is one thing but deliberately trying to injure a person when you are not actually under threat is a crime.
Anybody with common sense knows this.

[TigersEye]

You said it was right and then you contradicted yourself by saying it wasn't rational.

Which you are not and I predict you will prove with your next post.

[Bean Counter]

Good. Danny is no prince, but he doesn’t deserve any heat over this one; although i will say he needs a little work on his loft...

And as for Johhny, it coulcn’t have happened to a nicer guy.

[Jorge]

Say what?

[Grizzled Bear]

You might not realize it, but that was pretty much what I insinuated.

He restrained himself and took no further action after removing the perv from his body.

Of course anybody with common sense would have understood what I typed.

[Jorge]

You said it was right and then you contradicted yourself by saying it wasn't rational.

You really need to sharpen your reading comprehension skills.

I said he was right to "get the creep off him".

I said he was wrong to injure him (WHICH HE APOLOGIZED for BY THE WAY), but that we can't expect a person to always be rational in a situation like that.

Do you get the distinction now?

[Jorge]

Then we have no significant disagreement.

[TigersEye]

Just as I expected. ROTFLMAO

[Jorge]

Bonaduce was sweet to the idiot. He could have taken his head off. I've seen Bonaduce do nunchucks and he has a black belt in at least one martial art. And here not afraid of a fight:

Yes, and he was smart enough to apologize for injuring the guy in this case. Which was the right thing to do.

[Grizzled Bear]

Agreed. You’re getting hit from too many directions as it is so I’ll just let it go right here.

Have a good evening.

[Jorge]

So you can't articulate a coherant response to my post.
Just as I THOUGHT.
LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL

[Grizzled Bear]

Yes, and he was smart enough to apologize for injuring the guy in this case. Which was the right thing to do.

---

One more question, even though I said that was the end of it...

Did the perv apologize for his “assault” on Bonaduce? Let’s face it, if a man did anything remotely similar to a woman he’d be hosed!

[Jorge]

Agreed. You’re getting hit from too many directions as it is so I’ll just let it go right here.

It's all the same direction.

Knocking these low IQ blow hard bag of winds out is a real turkey shoot for me.

I love every minute of it. I live for this stuff.

[Jorge]

Did the perv apologize for his “assault” on Bonaduce? Let’s face it, if a man did anything remotely similar to a woman he’d be hosed!

I agree. And he absolutely should have apologized for what he did to Bonaduce on stage.

I bet you he thinks twice about doing it to somebody else.

[hodaka]

I could have seen the decision going either way.

[TigersEye]

I said he was right to "get the creep off him".

So it was a rational thing to do.

I said he was wrong to injure him ...

That was an accident as Danny had no control over that.

(WHICH HE APOLOGIZED for BY THE WAY),

I don't know what Bonaduce apologized for but saying he was sorry he got hurt would make sense. Apologizing for defending himself would not.

... but that we can't expect a person to always be rational in a situation like that.

Then he wasn't right to "get the creep off him" if he didn't act rationally!?!

Do you get the distinction now?

Yes. You contradicted yourself. BTW your last post was very interesting.