[Lancey Howard]

Dems turn backs on truth to further agenda

No offense meant to Kathryn Jean Lopez, but the title implies that the rats were previously facing the truth. That is, they had to have faced the truth in order to turn their backs to it. When did the rats ever care about truth, honesty, integrity, etc.?

[sig226]

Possibly around 1890.

[Kaslin]

No offense meant to Kathryn Jean Lopez, but the title implies that the rats were previously facing the truth. That is, they had to have faced the truth in order to turn their backs to it. When did the rats ever care about truth, honesty, integrity, etc.?

Aren't you mistaking facing the truth with telling the truth?

[CalvaryJohn]

I don’t think she meant it that way, but I interpret it to mean the Dems lie continually.

[Jimmy Valentine]

When they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing theAmerican Dream.

[reefdiver]

They are the minority, have been the minority for a long time. They only win when we put in our own rotten apple. It doesn’t matter what they say or think. We drive the agenda

[NRG1973]

There is something else going on here besides an attempt to get revenge for the Gen. Betrayus ad: The Democrats are about to give Bush a huge increase in military spending (defense spending bill to go to $648 billion) and $150 billion for the wars in Iraq and Aphganistan. So they are using the Rush incident to try distracting their anti-war wing (the Ladies-in-Pink, ANSWER, and the Out-of-Iraq caucus) from that fact. I don’t think its going to work as these organizations are already bitter about the last time that the Dems funded the war.