Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brices Crossroads
are not on a par with Fred Thompson when it comes understanding and intelligently discussing the Constitution.

You must be joking. Fred's position on the FMA is going to cede territory to the enemy before the battle even starts.

32 posted on 10/06/2007 2:38:17 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah (Catholic4Mitt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Canticle_of_Deborah

“Fred’s position on the FMA is going to cede territory to the enemy before the battle even starts.”

LOL. Fred’s Amendment would have prevented Romney from acting as he did. It requires the state legislature alone, with the governor’s signature, to pass such a law. Had Fred’s Amendment been in place Romney would not have been able to implement the Goodridge decision, because the Goodridge decision itself would have been unconstitutional. Under Fred’s Amendment, any citizen could have sued Mitt in federal court to enjoin him from ordering the Clerks to issue the licenses. In other words, Fred’s Amendment would have protected Mitt from himself and Massachusetts from Mitt.


33 posted on 10/06/2007 3:00:48 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson