Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brices Crossroads
You are absolutely right. In ANY other state where courts have ruled their marriage laws unconstitutional, the Gov’s have had a stay put on the implementation of these pseudo marriages, until an amendment could be ratified. Romney had 6 months to do both, he didn’t.
50 posted on 10/06/2007 5:33:10 PM PDT by gidget7 ( Vote for the Arsenal of Democracy, because America RUNS on Duncan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: gidget7

“You are absolutely right. In ANY other state where courts have ruled their marriage laws unconstitutional, the Gov’s have had a stay put on the implementation of these pseudo marriages, until an amendment could be ratified. Romney had 6 months to do both, he didn’t.”

Because the AG and the lege needed to back him up on it, but didn’t. see #63. Romney sought a stay, but AG Reilly refused to help ....

“Press Release: Romney Files Emergency Bill to Seek Goodridge Decision Stay, April 15, 2004

Romney announced April 15 that he would seek emergency legislation to allow him to appoint a special counsel to ask the Supreme Judicial Court for a 2 1/2 year delay of its gay marriage ruling set to take effect May 17. Romney’s plan was to bypass AG Reilly—who refused to name a special counsel in March—and name his own special counsel, retired SJC Justice Joseph Nolan. Romney said the legislation would allow him to “protect the integrity of the Constitutional process” and return the decision on gay marriage to voters. “We believe the people have the right to have their position heard and that as the governor, I should have right to have my position heard. Look, people that don’t have any income are entitled to representation. Everyone in the Commonwealth is entitled to representation. But somehow as governor of the Commonwealth, it’s deemed that I can’t represent my view before the courts—I think that’s a mistake,” said Romney.

State House News Service reported April 22 that Romney’s special counsel bill was “languishing” on Beacon Hill. The main obstacle was the Senate, which failed to admit the bill in its last two sessions. Senate President Robert Travaglini dismissed the legislation when it was announced and said the governor was only trying to push his “political agenda.” If the bill was not admitted, then there would not be a joint committee public hearing on it.


64 posted on 10/07/2007 7:46:08 AM PDT by WOSG (I just wish freepers would bash Democrats as much as they bash Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson