The paren in the headline slurs the Penn State faculty and administration, the local cops and prosecutors. (may be another Duke lacrosse situation).
The item to which you linked looked to be a discussion of the play by play of the game. Comments like ‘Amen brother’, ‘Atta Boy’ and ‘Throw deep’. Not exactly enlightening commentary.
type “rape” into the search field, it will change then
not too flattering here either:
http://www.topix.net/forum/source/the-morning-call/TL67DMU6HJQKFCPOL
My reference to the Duke lacrosse situation had to do with information I read in an online report (not this one) about the accuser (it was reported she said she was assaulted by a PSU offensive football player). It was rumored (I've been reading a lot of sources) that Scott broke curfew and came in drunk at 4 AM the same evening. People, not me, but other people are connecting the two events.
My reference to this had nothing to do with the response of the Penn State faculty, administration, local cops and prosecutors because as yet, there has been no response from any of those entities.
The gossip I read was that Scott was being "set up".
I don't have anything against PSU. One of my children went there and had a great experience and next to the U of DE (my alma mater), they're my favorite college.
The Duke accuser did her cause immeasurable damage, because now whenever something like this happens, people wonder.
http://www.wjactv.com/news/14280739/detail.html
Do you find it strange that this report lumps all this information under the heading “PSU’s Scott Has Locker Emptied”? What conclusion is the reader expected to draw?