[Izzy Dunne]

I don't think these clowns realize how incredibly biased they really are.

[chesley]

And this is why Rush and O’Reilly and Sean and others are NEEDED. So the facts can get out.

[Jemian]

I would love to hear someone ask these bums, “Just whose side are you on? Are you a US citizen? Do you have any national concern?”

[trimom]

I don't think these clowns realize how incredibly biased they really are.

I don't mind that THEY don't know. I'm troubled by how much of the PUBLIC doesn't get it.

[traderrob6]

If the casualty rate would have dobled instead of halved —do you think it would have been heavily reported?

[johnny7]

“Not necessarily. The fact is we're at the beginning of a trend -- and it's not even sure that it is a trend yet.”

“..."enormous dispute over how to count”

Robin's easy to figger' out. She's not willing to suspend her disbelief... and she's careful not to let numbers betray-us.

[Bahbah]

One exception was Charlie Gibson, who made it the lead story on ABC's "WORLD NEWS."

Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't Gibson have the best viewer numbers of all of the alphabets? Maybe it's because he reports the news. Novel idea.

[bray]

The Surge has Worked and the War is Ending
Just don’t expect PravdABDNC to report it.

Pray for W and Our Troops

[Allegra]

The fact is we're at the beginning of a trend -- and it's not even sure that it is a trend yet. There is also an enormous dispute over how to count the numbers. There are different kinds of deaths in Iraq.

Let me make it real simple for you, Robin, you ditzy liberal swine.

We're hearing a hell of a lot fewer explosions in Baghdad. We're pretty much hearing crickets chirping these days. This "trend" has gone on since about mid-August.

There are "different kinds of deaths" everywhere, Robin, you moron.

What you whiny, anti-war liberals hate is that this thing is working and you know it. And it's working so well, that you slimebuckets can't figure out a way to put a spin on it, so you ignore it.

[rollo tomasi]

Perhaps Kurtz should have asked if a democrat was Pres. would reporting about bad news be wrong since the numbers are “tricky,” and is “at the beginning of a trend,” plus there’s “enormous dispute over how to count” them.

[Bullish]

Their "reporting" is actually quite on the side of evil.

And they think they should be taken seriously?

[avacado]

"We've had five years of the Pentagon telling us there is progress, there is progress. Forgive me for being skeptical, I need to see a little bit more than one month before I get too excited about all of this."

Just report the frikin' news you asshat! We don't care how YOU "feel!"

[lilylangtree]

MSM at its finest (sarc) and finally truthfulness about their hidden agenda.

[oust the louse]

I don't think these *(ASS)* clowns realize how incredibly biased they really are.

SORRY,Had to fix that Izzy...

[squidly]

I don't think these clowns realize how incredibly biased they really are.

"But everyone I know voted for McGovern!"

[P.O.E.]

As a Giant fan living in Eagles TV coverage territory, I’m well aware of media bias. As long as the Giants kick their butt, I’m really not that concerned.

[weegee]

Media Schadenfreude and Media Shenanigans PING

[Political Junkie Too]

The fact is we're at the beginning of a trend -- and it's not even sure that it is a trend yet. There is also an enormous dispute over how to count the numbers.

This is also their strategy for reporting election returns in November.

-PJ

[Bulldawg Fan]

Phony media?

[MovementConservative]

I don't think these clowns realize how incredibly biased they really are.

Whatever do you mean? If you are right, then you can't possibly be biased. Bias is what the other person, like Fox News, is.

[tje]

What these guys are doing is rationalizing their bias. They are in a quandry. They are hoping this ‘trend’ will not continue.