You don't trot out your "pro-life" resume because you do not have one. When you trot it out, I will start paying attention. Meanwhile, you are irrelevant and so are your opinions. I just cannot imagine why you expect to be called a liar. Force of habit, perhaps???
If, by "rehabilitate", you mean convert me to your delusions and desire to empower irresponsible men, don't waste your time. It won't happen in your lifetime or in God's lifetime. Nor will your pet eccentricities have the slightest effect on the pro-life movement (or the conservative movement) in those time frames.
As to foreign adoptions, American courts are governed by "choice of law" principles favoring the laws of the country where the child was conceived., where the parents reside, where the contract for adoption was initiated, etc. This makes it simpler to guarantee long term results. Also, so long as the US recognizes the legal system of the country in question as competent generally, the US courts will tend to defer to foreign law with jurisdiction over the adoption.
I would never have guessed that you don't drink. The content of your posts certainly suggests otherwise.
Wow, who would have pegged you for someone trying to divert attention from the "stained dress" by pissing and whining about "the violation of trust" that brought it to light.
Your questions are nothing but a rhetorical "rope-a-dope" to ignore the elephant of the shameful pervasiveness of this aspect of youth culture.
Your "let them eat cake" superciliousness deserves the same treatment as the author of that particular saying.
You don't trot out your "pro-life" resume because you do not have one. When you trot it out, I will start paying attention.
No you won't. Paying attention to me would entail admitting that you have squandered vast amounts of time, effort, resources, and lives pursuing an agenda that always was (and more importantly should have been recongized with the application of RICO laws to peaceful pro-life advocacy groups, and corrosion of free speech rights in sidewalk interventions as) doomed to failure.
That you still refuse to see your own failure, or entertain another perspective in light of that undeniable failure, is testament to the integration of your vanity and the very fabric of your personality. You can no more detect your narrow-minded chauvinism than a fish can feel wet.
The modern reader owes CS Lewis many debts. In my opinion, one of the greatest debts is his description from "The Screwtape Letters" of how a person who actually consumes very little can be demonstrably proven to be a shameless glutton as in the case of the patient's mother.
His is a teaching you should pay singular attention to.
As to foreign adoptions...
And your prattle contradicts what I've said regarding Americans adopting overseas, how? Could it be that despite your useless verbosity you're admitting I'm absolutely correct?