Instead you're going to dig in your heels, cut off your nose to spite your own face, lose sight of the long term negative effects of a Hillary presidency for all the conservative causes you claim to so adamantly support, not to mention the negatives effects on our troops, our country and our standing in the world, and then disengenuously accept no responsibility for your actions.
I prefer to think that those Republicans who are bolting from long held conservative principles to support a New York liberal are the element of the party that is causing a schism within the coalition. If the democrats win it is because a phenomena that no one would have considered post Reagan - a pro-abortion, gay rights, cross-dresser Republican nominee - is being pushed by people like yourself.
Actions on both sides have consequences. Not just those of the social conservatives. If the Republican party nominates a person who differs drastically from we know to be Republican (don't play with definitions here, we all know what we're talking about), then they should be willing to accept that their social conservatives are not going to be gung-ho about their choice. You cannot say "compromise is part of politics" and then follow that immediately with "you do all the compromising" when addressing social conservatives. That's nonsensical.