Skip to comments.
Redford backs completely normal Cruise
IrelandOnline.com ^
| 10/08/07
| © Thomas Crosbie Media, 2007.
Posted on 10/08/2007 5:50:34 PM PDT by melt
Robert Redford has defended Tom Cruise, insisting the Hollywood superstar's behaviour was perfectly normal on the set of their new movie.
-SNIP-
In an interview with Playboy magazine, Redford says: "Tom's a talented actor and I think people will respond positively to him (in Lions For Lambs)…
"I didn't concern myself with the gossip - I never do - and I knew enough from what I've been through to judge the man based on what I experience firsthand. And I didn't see any behaviour on the film that troubled me. Really."
(Excerpt) Read more at breakingnews.iol.ie ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hollywood; madtom; nuts; psycho; redford
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
"Really."
Well, he convinced me...
1
posted on
10/08/2007 5:50:37 PM PDT
by
melt
To: melt
Man, Redford looks horrible.
2
posted on
10/08/2007 5:54:25 PM PDT
by
GnL
To: GnL
He’s just naturally blabby I guess.
To: GnL
Redford's on the right?
4
posted on
10/08/2007 6:00:26 PM PDT
by
billorites
(freepo ergo sum)
To: GnL
Seriously though, you don’t wear a sweater like that when you have wrinkles like his.
5
posted on
10/08/2007 6:01:57 PM PDT
by
billorites
(freepo ergo sum)
To: melt
6
posted on
10/08/2007 6:02:52 PM PDT
by
knews_hound
(In order to not be banned, I no longer discuss Politics here.)
To: GnL
I remember reading a long time ago that he doesn’t believe in plastic surgery
To: GnL; billorites
I can't decide if he's wearing a reddish JFK wig, or not.
8
posted on
10/08/2007 6:10:44 PM PDT
by
melt
(Someday, they'll wish their Jihad... Jihadn't.)
To: melt
Who the hell is going to vouch for Redford’s credibility?
Never mind — no one cares...
9
posted on
10/08/2007 6:26:24 PM PDT
by
river rat
(Semper Fi - You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
To: melt
What constitutes normal in Hollyweird rarely applies outside LA. Perhaps jumping on couches, expounding on mental health without any training (except direction from L. Ron Hubbard), etc. ARE normal in Hollywood. Remember these people’s raison d’etre (sp?) is to give life to other people’s words. I sometimes wonder if they actually ever have any original thoughts.
10
posted on
10/08/2007 6:27:06 PM PDT
by
originalbuckeye
(I want a hero....I'm holding out for a hero (politically))
To: melt
It behooves us to remind everyone that not only is Tom Cruise certifiably sane, he is also undeniably heterosexual.
That is all.
11
posted on
10/08/2007 6:32:01 PM PDT
by
Loyalist
(Social justice isn't; social studies aren't; social work doesn't.)
To: GnL
12
posted on
10/08/2007 6:35:46 PM PDT
by
gathersnomoss
(General George Patton had it right.)
To: billorites
Freep humor is Prime Time.
13
posted on
10/08/2007 6:37:10 PM PDT
by
gathersnomoss
(General George Patton had it right.)
To: GnL
He has not aged well, may be his liberal leanings over a lot of years. BEWARE!
14
posted on
10/08/2007 6:37:47 PM PDT
by
fishergirl
(My warrior, my soldier, my hero - my son. God bless our troops!)
To: melt
I guess having an evilcrat demon inside you for years will do that to your face. Butch Cassidy and the Road Rash Kid.
LLS
15
posted on
10/08/2007 6:42:20 PM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
(Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims!)
To: melt
What will Robert Redford want to say to the public next? Maybe Mr. Redford might have a hole in his sock he needs us to know about? Or that third shelf in his fridge? We all want to know what’s there. I wonder what other exciting things he has to tell us about absolutely nothing.
16
posted on
10/08/2007 6:45:50 PM PDT
by
isthisnickcool
(Tagline:(Optional, printed after your name on post0:)
To: billorites
Wow, I just saw him in The Natural the other night from 1984. And back then he was criticized for looking too old for the role. He was 47 back then!
17
posted on
10/08/2007 7:08:38 PM PDT
by
boop
(Trunk Monkey. Is there anything he can't do?)
To: melt
Notice the specifics...
“And I didn’t see any behaviour on the film that troubled me. Really.”
He didn’t notice anything on the film.... what he doesnt comment on is behavior that isn’t on the film...
To: billorites
“Redford’s on the right?”
I think so. It looks like Redford’s hair. But the turtleneck is a dead giveaway.
To: Loyalist
“he is also undeniably heterosexual.”
How do you draw that conclusion? Every time a rumor erupts that he’s not, he marries someone else. It’s a tactic right out of Michael Jackson’s publicist’s playbook.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
