Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brilliant

That single remark is enough to sink him, in my opinion. There is a visceral reaction to “running it by the lawyers” in this country. People are sick of the rising costs and nanny statism wrought by lawyers and insurance companies. I am bordering on incoherent babbling myself, just thinking of it’s ramifications.

I want a leader to decide and act on the right course for our security and our freedom. Lawyers be damned.


18 posted on 10/09/2007 5:04:48 PM PDT by prov1813man (While the one you despise and ridicule works to protect you, those you embrace work to destroy you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: prov1813man

Being a lawyer, I can tell you that he’d be a complete idiot if he invaded Iran without asking a lawyer whether it was legal first.

On the other hand, he gave the lawyers more than their due. He made it sound like he’d delegate the decision to his lawyers.

Of course, Giuliani is a lawyer, so I don’t think his conversations with the lawyers would have much to do with what he does. So is Thompson.


19 posted on 10/09/2007 5:11:16 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: prov1813man
Looks like that’s what presidents have done and will do in the future.....Imagine that.

September 25, 2001

MEMORANDUM OPINION FOR THE DEPUTY COUNSEL TO THE PRESIDENT

You have asked for our opinion as to the scope of the President’s authority to take military action in response to the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001. We conclude that the President has broad constitutional power to use military force. Congress has acknowledged this inherent executive power in both the War Powers Resolution, Pub. L. No. 93-148, 87 Stat. 555 (1973), codified at 50 U.S.C. §§ 1541-1548 (the “WPR”), and in the Joint Resolution passed by Congress on September 14, 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-40, 115 Stat. 224 (2001). Further, the President has the constitutional power not only to retaliate against any person, organization, or State suspected of involvement in terrorist attacks on the United States, but also against foreign States suspected of harboring or supporting such organizations. Finally, the President may deploy military force preemptively against terrorist organizations or the States that harbor or support them, whether or not they can be linked to the specific terrorist incidents of September 11. http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/warpowers925.htm

25 posted on 10/09/2007 6:56:23 PM PDT by redgirlinabluestate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: prov1813man

Willard, what do you think your powers are in this case?

Ask my lawyer.

Well, Willard, do you need to ask the Congress?

I SAID, ASK MY LAYWER!


26 posted on 10/09/2007 6:58:11 PM PDT by Petronski (Congratulations Tribe! AL Central Champs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson