Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Author Stanley Kurtz is a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center.
1 posted on 10/09/2007 10:56:47 PM PDT by B-Chan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: B-Chan

Makes a little too much sense for the government to take action. But thanks for posting it.


2 posted on 10/09/2007 10:59:53 PM PDT by squidly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Huntsville hunkers down with largest shelter system in the nation

By Jay Reeves
Associated Press
Sunday, September 30, 2007

HUNTSVILLE, Ala. -- In an age of al-Qaida, sleeper cells and the threat of nuclear terrorism, Huntsville is dusting off its Cold War manual to create the nation's most ambitious fallout-shelter plan, featuring an abandoned mine big enough for 20,000 people to take cover underground.

Others would hunker down in college dorms, churches, libraries and research halls that planners hope will bring the community's shelter capacity to 300,000, or space for every man, woman and child in Huntsville and the surrounding county.

Emergency planners in Huntsville -- best known as the home of NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center -- say the idea makes sense because radioactive fallout could be scattered for hundreds of miles if terrorists detonated a nuclear bomb.

"If Huntsville is in the blast zone, there's not much we can do. But if it's just fallout ... shelters would absorb 90 percent of the radiation," said longtime emergency management planner Kirk Paradise.

Huntsville's project, developed using a $70,000 Homeland Security grant, goes against the grain, as the United States scrapped its fallout shelter plan after the Soviet Union's collapse. Congress cut funding, and the government published its last shelter list in 1992.

After Sept. 11, Homeland Security created a metropolitan protection program that includes nuclear-attack preparation and mass shelters. But no other city has taken the idea as far as Huntsville has, officials said.

Many cities advise residents to stay at home and seal up a room with plastic and duct tape during a biological, chemical or nuclear attack. Huntsville does too, in certain cases.

Local officials agree the "shelter-in-place" method would be best for a "dirty bomb" that scattered nuclear contamination through conventional explosives. But full-fledged shelters would be needed for a nuclear bomb.

Huntsville program leaders recently briefed members of Congress, including Rep. Charlie Dent, R-Pa., who called the city's shelter plan an example of the "all-hazards" approach needed for emergency preparedness.

"Al-Qaida, we know, is interested in a nuclear capability. It's our nation's fear that a nuclear weapon could get into terrorists' hands," Dent said.

In all, the Huntsville-Madison County Emergency Management Agency has found 105 places that can be used as fallout shelters for about 210,000 people. They still seek about 50 more shelters for an additional 100,000 people.

While officials have yet to launch a campaign to inform people of the shelters, a local access TV channel showed a video about the program, which also is explained on a county Web site.

If a bomb went off tomorrow, Paradise said, officials would tell people where to find shelter via TV and radio. "We're pretty much ready to go because we have a list of shelters," he said.

Most shelters would offer more comfort than the abandoned mine, such as buildings at the University of Alabama in Huntsville that would house 37,643.

Plans call for staying inside for as long as two weeks after a bomb blast, though shelters might be needed for only a few hours in a less dire emergency.

Unlike the fallout shelters set up during the Cold War, the new ones will not be stocked with water, food or other supplies. For survivors of a nuclear attack, it would be strictly "BYOE" -- bring your own everything.

3 posted on 10/09/2007 11:02:16 PM PDT by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: B-Chan
By the end of the Cold War, attempts to stave off nuclear holocaust with drills and shelters looked ridiculous.

"Looked" as in perception.

So people risked dying with smirks on their faces. They "stopped worrying and loved the bomb" one could say.

4 posted on 10/09/2007 11:04:43 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: B-Chan
" What am I thinking of?"

His actual answer: unstocked nationwide local, state and federal boondoggles

My answer: personal responsibility and a comfortable home.

5 posted on 10/09/2007 11:28:21 PM PDT by gnarledmaw (There is no problem that cant be made worse by leaving it up to government...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: B-Chan
No such thread would be complete without a reference to Nuclear War Survival Skills
6 posted on 10/09/2007 11:42:51 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (Grovelnator Schwarzenkaiser, fashionable fascism one charade at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: B-Chan

Back in the fifties and early sixties I participated in hundreds if not thousands of “duck and cover” school drills with the rest of nation. Under the desk, on the floor, blah, blah.

Older and wiser in high school we* decided the best thing to do if awaiting an imminent nearby Nuc was: race to the curb, secure your spot, sit down, legs wide, bend over, (as far as you can) and kiss your butt goodbye cause you’re gonna die!

Things haven’t changed much. :-)


8 posted on 10/09/2007 11:56:52 PM PDT by JoeSixPack1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: B-Chan

Monolithic dome home or shelter. If you want one, dig up your back yard and build it.

http://www.monolithic.com/

The last thing we need is yet another government program “for the children”


10 posted on 10/10/2007 12:19:08 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: B-Chan; All
They can build all the fallout shelters they want......I’m not going to participate. Chances are a full fledged nuke war would cause far greater damage to us and the planet than we can imagine. (no one knows just what would really happen with multiple detonations over a wide area)

Anybody remember the Super Dome?

I think I’ll grab a six-pack, climb a hill and watch the show. Screw It!

14 posted on 10/10/2007 4:46:31 AM PDT by wolfcreek (The Status Quo Sucks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson