And to relegate life and death issues such as abortion and our 2nd Amendment RIGHTS (a CONSTITUTIONAL right, no less) to the term, "social" issues, is plain wrong, and against what should be, and still is (last time I checked), part of our CORE values, principles, and platform.
Except for the border/illegal issues, lack of using the line item veto more to control spending, reaching out "across the aisle" to our domestic enemies (the liberal dems), Bush has done a decent, fairly Conservative job in office.
His Supreme Court appointees, while not as rabidly Conservative as I'd like them, were pretty good (especially in comparison to some previous appointees by Republican presidents), and his (no matter what he SAID while running for office) outward support for the 2nd Amendment (particulalry when Ashcroft was AG, and Bolton was at the UN) was great.
So to say that we'd be better getting as far away from a Bush clone is an ASSININE, demonRAT-like thing to say on a CONSERVATIVE forum like FR.
If anything, we need to find someone with the GOOD points of President Bush, AND a MORE Conservative, hard-nosed view on the items he has been dem/RINO-like on.
Picking an arrogant (yes, that's the opposite of Bush), elitist (again, the opposite of Bush), northeastern-corridor (O.K., so he was born in enemy territory, at least his formative years were in "God's Country"), LIBERAL (Bush has a few liberal tendencies, while RINO-rudy is 99.9% liberal) like judy ruliani (infamous cross-dresser rudy is DEFINITELY the opposite of Bush on this one too) would be just "great" for our country and our party.
Go knock yourself out supporting and voting for this LIBERAL RINO POS.
Nice rant. But you still didnt answer the question about your Moniker.
Well said.