Posted on 10/11/2007 11:31:21 AM PDT by RogerFGay
Going into the election season, Hillary's people knew they'd have a huge chore, as being charged with putting Karl Marx in convincing centrist drag is no small job, but is it working?
There has been story after story in the past few days about how "surprisingly likable" Hillary is on the campaign trail. I was watching one network news story yesterday where a reporter actually referred to her as "centrist." Centrist? This guy would have reported the Titanic sinking as "damp."
Pathetic Clinton suck-up and perma-annoyance on cable news programs Lanny Davis said that people are finding out that Hillary isn't this demonic satan in a pantsuit she's been made out to be because she's smiling, laughing and shaking hands. You have to get a kick out of how the left is spinning the right's opinion of Hillary Clinton: The fact that she doesn't literally have cloven hooves and devil horns is proof of her pure motives and that conservatives are paranoid and delusional.
Forget that she's said, not too long ago, that the government should "take things from you on behalf of the common good" and that she wants to socialize everything up to and including making every square on your Monopoly game "community chest." She's smiling when she says these things, and serving home made cookies, so it's got to be okay, right?
If people refuse to look into Hillary's past and what she's made obvious as to what her socialist goals are, there's a good chance that many of those who fell for her phony makeover will be in for a big surprise after she takes the oath of office in January of 2009.
"Look, she's beautiful… she's… hey wait a minute… noooo!"
Of course, I may not be the best one to ask, because I'm probably just a VRWC member, and a misogynist.
To start with — her name is
Hillary Clinton not Hillary
and smiling,laughing, and shaking hands DOES NOT make a good person.
A good person starts from within, it is their beliefs, their morals, their actions, their family & friends. It is their today and yes their yesterday.
Being a Saul Alinsky follower more describes hillary clinton (small letters = small person) than, than, well her hiring Sandy Berger, who she “has known for more than thirty years”.
This election will show how the media has in the past and does effect our elections - thru mis-information and a lack of information!!
I'm neither of those things, and I agree with you 100%.
YOU SHOULD BE SHOT!!!! Why, why, why did you do this to us?
Shar pei ???
By January the MSM will be describing her Hillness as a combination of Mother Theresa and Sharon Stone.
The Clinton's have been expert at feigning sincerity and likability when they need votes. Is anyone stalking her to record when the famous Clinton Purple Rage erupts? Any lamps or ash trays flying around behind the scenes?
If people refuse to look into Hillary’s past and what she’s made obvious as to what her socialist goals are, there’s a good chance that many of those who fell for her phony makeover will be in for a big surprise after she takes the oath of office in January of 2009.
You have to realize, liberals can’t look deep - there is no deep for them. They rely only on their emotions and phony rhetoric. In other words they will always adore her no matter what.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.