Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is 'Extreme Hillary Makeover' Working?
BlogWonks ^ | Doug Powers

Posted on 10/11/2007 11:31:21 AM PDT by RogerFGay

Going into the election season, Hillary's people knew they'd have a huge chore, as being charged with putting Karl Marx in convincing centrist drag is no small job, but is it working?

There has been story after story in the past few days about how "surprisingly likable" Hillary is on the campaign trail. I was watching one network news story yesterday where a reporter actually referred to her as "centrist." Centrist? This guy would have reported the Titanic sinking as "damp."

Pathetic Clinton suck-up and perma-annoyance on cable news programs Lanny Davis said that people are finding out that Hillary isn't this demonic satan in a pantsuit she's been made out to be because she's smiling, laughing and shaking hands. You have to get a kick out of how the left is spinning the right's opinion of Hillary Clinton: The fact that she doesn't literally have cloven hooves and devil horns is proof of her pure motives and that conservatives are paranoid and delusional.

Forget that she's said, not too long ago, that the government should "take things from you on behalf of the common good" and that she wants to socialize everything up to and including making every square on your Monopoly game "community chest." She's smiling when she says these things, and serving home made cookies, so it's got to be okay, right?

If people refuse to look into Hillary's past and what she's made obvious as to what her socialist goals are, there's a good chance that many of those who fell for her phony makeover will be in for a big surprise after she takes the oath of office in January of 2009.

"Look, she's beautiful… she's… hey wait a minute… noooo!"

null



TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 10/11/2007 11:31:25 AM PDT by RogerFGay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RogerFGay
I can't speak for anyone else, but looking back to when I first became aware of the Beast, I thought she was a hideous, pandering, Marxist. And I still feel exactly the same way today as I did back then.

Of course, I may not be the best one to ask, because I'm probably just a VRWC member, and a misogynist.

2 posted on 10/11/2007 11:49:06 AM PDT by libs_kma (www.imwithfred.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RogerFGay

To start with — her name is

Hillary Clinton not Hillary

and smiling,laughing, and shaking hands DOES NOT make a good person.

A good person starts from within, it is their beliefs, their morals, their actions, their family & friends. It is their today and yes their yesterday.

Being a Saul Alinsky follower more describes hillary clinton (small letters = small person) than, than, well her hiring Sandy Berger, who she “has known for more than thirty years”.

This election will show how the media has in the past and does effect our elections - thru mis-information and a lack of information!!


3 posted on 10/11/2007 12:00:04 PM PDT by malia (President Bush *** Rush *** Beck *** SandRat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libs_kma
Of course, I may not be the best one to ask, because I'm probably just a VRWC member, and a misogynist.

I'm neither of those things, and I agree with you 100%.

4 posted on 10/11/2007 12:00:29 PM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RogerFGay


New Drive-By Push to Warm Hillary
5 posted on 10/11/2007 12:02:27 PM PDT by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RogerFGay

6 posted on 10/11/2007 12:21:34 PM PDT by COUNTrecount
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

YOU SHOULD BE SHOT!!!! Why, why, why did you do this to us?

Shar pei ???


7 posted on 10/11/2007 12:30:50 PM PDT by CherylBower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RogerFGay

By January the MSM will be describing her Hillness as a combination of Mother Theresa and Sharon Stone.


8 posted on 10/11/2007 12:34:00 PM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RogerFGay
The last two days on Prime Time America, a Christian version of NPR (but without taxpayer money) had interviews with Carl Bernstein on his new Hillary book, A Woman In Charge. He was carrying the water for her in 55 gallon drums. He was talking about her soft, religious side, that she had given up the opportunity to be president of a certain Methodist College (Wessley?), I don't remember. He said that she would have made a good preacher, that she was passionate about her faith and so on and so forth. I finally had to turn it off, even though I like the host, Greg Wheatley. I might start believing her spiritual talk when she renounces abortion.

Prime Time America

9 posted on 10/11/2007 12:35:40 PM PDT by InvisibleChurch (Tempus Fidget - The time between the final hymn and recessional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RogerFGay
....how "surprisingly likable" Hillary is on the campaign trail...

The Clinton's have been expert at feigning sincerity and likability when they need votes. Is anyone stalking her to record when the famous Clinton Purple Rage erupts? Any lamps or ash trays flying around behind the scenes?

10 posted on 10/11/2007 12:55:37 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RogerFGay

If people refuse to look into Hillary’s past and what she’s made obvious as to what her socialist goals are, there’s a good chance that many of those who fell for her phony makeover will be in for a big surprise after she takes the oath of office in January of 2009.

You have to realize, liberals can’t look deep - there is no deep for them. They rely only on their emotions and phony rhetoric. In other words they will always adore her no matter what.


11 posted on 10/11/2007 2:21:57 PM PDT by Bitsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RogerFGay
With the Clintons, I won't take anything on faith. How do we know she doesn't have cloven hooves? Has anyone seen her barefoot? What about that lovey-dovey photo of her and Bill on the beach that was released to the public shortly before Monica Lewinsky became a household name? Was she wearing any footwear in that photo?
12 posted on 10/11/2007 5:01:50 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson