Skip to comments.
Law puts renters' status off-limits
The San Diego Union-Tribune ^
| 10/12/2007
| Michael Gardner
Posted on 10/12/2007 10:12:06 AM PDT by South40
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
To: kbennkc
You forgot to mention that Idaho has already been tainted by enough Californians that we don’t need anymore.
21
posted on
10/12/2007 10:42:28 AM PDT
by
The Iceman Cometh
(Democrats In Control! (Where's my friggin' free stuff?))
To: South40
CA landlords can now legally aid, abet, and harbor criminals. Thanks, Arnie.
22
posted on
10/12/2007 10:45:24 AM PDT
by
mtbopfuyn
(I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
To: South40
I was reading this as a good idea until this: "The new law, which takes effect Jan. 1, also prohibits landlords from collecting that information independently."
Im all for not making land lords do the job of the INS but to prohibit them from checking on the immigration status of people occupying their property is insane...
23
posted on
10/12/2007 10:47:13 AM PDT
by
N3WBI3
(Ah, arrogance and stupidity all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari)
To: South40
24
posted on
10/12/2007 10:54:12 AM PDT
by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
To: South40
With the way things are going, soon most all the illegal aliens will be in illegal friendly California. Look at the bright side, at least if you don’t happen to live there.
25
posted on
10/12/2007 10:55:37 AM PDT
by
Will88
To: Shots
“The new law, which takes effect Jan. 1, also prohibits landlords from collecting that information independently.”
Clearly stated above.
26
posted on
10/12/2007 10:55:39 AM PDT
by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
To: DesertSapper
27
posted on
10/12/2007 10:55:51 AM PDT
by
ichabod1
("Self defense is not only our right, it is our duty." President Ronald Reagan)
To: MEGoody
To: TLI
29
posted on
10/12/2007 11:13:28 AM PDT
by
South40
(Amnesty for ILLEGALS is a slap in the face to the USBP!)
To: N3WBI3
Are landlords in California allowed to demand photo ID and run credit checks? The prospect would probably deter a lot of illegals.
30
posted on
10/12/2007 11:16:34 AM PDT
by
Squawk 8888
(Is human activity causing the warming trend on Mars?)
To: discostu
I dont think the law stops you from checking, it just makes it so the town your property is in cant make such checks mandatory. Its a really weird looking law."The new law, which takes effect Jan. 1, also prohibits landlords from collecting that information independently."
31
posted on
10/12/2007 11:17:01 AM PDT
by
South40
(Amnesty for ILLEGALS is a slap in the face to the USBP!)
To: Squawk 8888
Are landlords in California allowed to demand photo ID and run credit checks? Yes, landlords in Kalifornia are allowed to inquire and know who they are renting their property to...until now.
32
posted on
10/12/2007 11:21:53 AM PDT
by
South40
(Amnesty for ILLEGALS is a slap in the face to the USBP!)
To: Old Professer
I doubt that would hold up in a court of law. As long as the questions are not based on religion or race there is nothing even this law that can prohibit you from asking what you want. A good example is they cannot prohibit you from doing a credit check. Any smart owner could use that alone to disqualify a potential tenant. No rental history with references equals no rental for you bozo.
33
posted on
10/12/2007 11:31:23 AM PDT
by
Shots
To: TLI
I left 18 months ago. Lived there 30 years.
34
posted on
10/12/2007 11:41:08 AM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
To: South40
Open Borders Arnold.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
35
posted on
10/12/2007 11:42:55 AM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: South40
36
posted on
10/12/2007 12:18:12 PM PDT
by
discostu
(a mountain is something you don't want to %^&* with)
To: South40
Sounds like something Bush would do. I guess Arnold is a real Republican.
37
posted on
10/12/2007 12:25:07 PM PDT
by
isrul
(Lamentations 5:2)
To: stephenjohnbanker
I left 18 months ago. Lived there 30 years. Well that is a shame because I understand it was a nice place at one time. Then again, I will never get to see Rhodesia and I understand from my friends it was a rather remarkable place as well. Too bad neither one exists any more. Funny thing is they were both destroyed pretty much the same way.
38
posted on
10/12/2007 4:32:32 PM PDT
by
TLI
( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
To: TLI
“Well that is a shame because I understand it was a nice place at one time”
It was a GREAT place to live when I moved there in 1976.
Conservative, and the people were nice. Now it is a hellhole, and nobody trusts anyone!!
39
posted on
10/12/2007 5:07:41 PM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
(Pray for, and support our troops(heroes) !! And vote out the RINO's!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson