Posted on 10/13/2007 9:14:57 AM PDT by EagleUSA
Since Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton announced her bid for the U.S. presidency in 2008, the media has not asked her the really tough questions regarding her role during her husband’s presidency.
For example, during the first Democratic debate on April 26, host Brian Williams of MSNBC hardly mentioned her previous role as first lady from 1993 until 2001. In fact, many commentators have stated that the most difficult hurdle Hillary faces in her bid to secure the Democratic nomination is to account for the vote she cast in 2002 authorizing Bush to use military force in Iraq. For example, in a piece written for The New York Times on February 18, Patrick Healy writes that “navigating the antiwar anger…is perhaps her biggest challenge.” Hence, the major question that is currently being raised is: Can Hillary convince voters that she is at once for the war and against it? And the answer is: Of course she can! Talking out of both sides of one’s mouth is a Clinton trademark: both husband and wife have perfected this to the point that they are almost ventriloquists.
In fact, Bill and Hillary must be laughing at the characterization of this as “one of the most difficult challenges” they face in order to secure the White House. Bill and Hillary have so many skeletons in their closet they are delighted when there are issues distracting the public from their corrupt and decadent lives. Thus far, the Clintons have managed to escape the media frenzy on the question which they surely fear the most: To what extent was Hillary embroiled in all the scandals that afflicted her husband’s presidency?
(Excerpt) Read more at hillaryproject.com ...
“the media frenzy on the question which they surely fear the most: To what extent was Hillary embroiled in all the scandals that afflicted her husband’s presidency?”
The media are well paid off....and afraid of dying at the behest of the Clintiban.
Wonder how many billions and billions this is costing: buying the Presidency.
“Nothing touches these two and I find it amazing.”
“Who can argue that the (modern age) is not entirely mine?” (Paraphrase of Satan from the movie, “The Devil’s Advocate.”
He does love his believers.
They are greased by evil.
Wonder how many billions and billions this is costing: buying the Presidency.
::::::::
We will never know. But you can bet your life there is much money, mainly from foreign sources, that want to see an international-pandering Marxist in the White House, especially one they know they can buy easily. One that will debilitate the U.S. military, and bow to the will of the U.N., including communist and Islamic powers. MUCH MONEY is going to buy that scenarios’ possibility.
With federally controlled health care (using the disgrace of the UK and Canadian systems as a template), the embrace of islam as a true religion of peace and the followers to be placed on a pedestal...along with the perverted homosexuals, the utter degradation of the military, the appointment of socialist justices to the Supreme Court and the judges to the lower ones, and the taxation of everyone to pay for more leftist schemes-- our country is toast!
seems to me a bit of a conflict...
I agree the GOP needs leadership, but I cannot sit home in November and watch the beast from the east rule this country....
The media is acting like the “good Germans” of Hitler’s Germany.
I agree the GOP needs leadership, but I cannot sit home in November and watch the beast from the east rule this country....
:::::::
This Marixist beast cannot be allowed to get into the Oval Office, no matter what. Many have no clue of the damage to American freedoms and our Consitution this power-mad socialist can do along with her scumbag buddies in the socialist-dominated Congress. The two are a death sentence for America. Just look at the efforts they are making now to take over the medical industry and socialize it (put it under government control). They are power and control fanatics and must be stopped.
It's too early - the witch isn't the nominee yet; if we started hammering this soon, it'd be dismissed as "old news" if brought back up during an actual campaign.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.