Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: John Valentine

Ok, I assume you are referring to his position on the sale of NASDAQ? I haven’t really thought through that issue all that much but my guess would be that Hunter would view it through the same lense as the Dubai Ports deal or existing laws which allow the government to place restrictions on what types of technology and production defense contractors can move to overseas manufacturing plants.


50 posted on 10/13/2007 9:38:37 PM PDT by dschapin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: dschapin

NASDAQ is a stock market holding company for crying out loud. It is a publicly traded company. It isn’t a manufacturer either domestically or overseas and it has nothing to do with military technology. It doesn’t operate sensitive ports.

Hunter overreached. Clearly, his instincts are very suspect.


51 posted on 10/13/2007 9:55:02 PM PDT by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: All
Bump

FRED VETS, SIGN UP TODAY AT:

54 posted on 10/14/2007 1:55:28 AM PDT by W04Man (I'm Now With Fred http://Vets4Fred.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson