Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee; Rush4U
They are not asking for a seat at the table, they are demanding the right to dictate the choice at the table. Instead of pursuing this arrogant, self defeating policy, they should be organizing to throw their support behind one of the “Second tier” candidates. There are plenty of solid Conservative out there.

IF they are so powerful, they should be able to mobile and pick the candidate. They are not willing to do that. They want to tell the party WHO they can pick.

That is not how a Constitutional Republic works.

18 posted on 10/13/2007 11:19:52 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Yo Democrats : Don't tell us how to fight the war, we will not tell you how to be the village idiots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MNJohnnie
IF they are so powerful, they should be able to mobile and pick the candidate. They are not willing to do that. They want to tell the party WHO they can pick.

Fair enough.

20 posted on 10/13/2007 11:23:27 AM PDT by Rush4U
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie; jedward; TitansAFC; Rush4U; stephenjohnbanker; indylindy; Liz; Kevmo; ...

The goal of CONSERVATIVES is to make sure that the GOP nominates a CONSERVATIVE, thus it is MANDATORY to do anything necessary to defeat Rooty Toot. Now, I understand that this might not have the support of your WAnker comrades, but that’s how CONSERVATIVES feel.


24 posted on 10/13/2007 11:31:25 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie
That is not how a Constitutional Republic works.

This is exactly how a Constitutional Republic works. People have the God-given right of free association. Each adult has a Constitutionally derived right to vote for -- or withhold his/her vote from -- any candidate. Obviously citizens have every right to band together in a loose group as the religious right has and say they will or will not vote for a given candidate.

The Reagan coalition of social conservatives, libertarian conservatives and national security hawks only exists as long as it's in all our mutual interests. Neither social conservatives nor libertarian conservatives demand veto power over the GOP candidate -- many of us are simply saying that if it's Giuliani, we can't vote for him. That's not demanding veto power -- no one has denied you the right to form a new coalition and replace our votes, if you can.

90 posted on 10/13/2007 9:00:44 PM PDT by ellery (I don't remember a constitutional amendment that gives you the right not to be identified-R.Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson