Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Calpernia
Calpernia,

Nice job trying to explain away Ron Paul's win at this conference. But, given that Romney and Hunter both attended this conference, and Ron Paul did not but got more votes than the two of them combined, I can draw only two conclusions:

(1) Support for Ron Paul is a lot deeper than most are willing to admit; or

(2) Romney and Hunter's campaigns made a serious error by agreeing to speak at an event that was pre-rigged for Ron Paul. Well, on second thought - this is a huge boost for Hunter. But Romney's stock definitely drops on this news. He avoided Farah and Schlafly at the value voters debate, he avoided Tavis Smiley at the black-oriented debate, but he just stepped on a land mine this time.

5 posted on 10/14/2007 4:51:24 AM PDT by WWTD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: WWTD

I think SierraScrapper is pretty familiar with the area she lives in.

Jason Wright and Stephen Fountain run PoliticalDerby.com, where this story is published from. And Jason Wright verified the straw poll results.

So, you can surf over to PoliticalDerby.com to get a feel for the site, story, conference and get questions answered.


11 posted on 10/14/2007 5:06:12 AM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: WWTD

“(1) Support for Ron Paul is a lot deeper than most are willing to admit; or...”

Not really. Let’s do some math. According to Calpernia, Duncan Hunter missed out on 2nd place by two votes. The difference between 2nd and 3rd place was 0.0151, meaning that two votes equals 0.0150 votes. If that’s true, then only about 132 people participated in this poll. If that’s true, then Ron Paul got about 43 votes. Forty-three votes does not translate to wide support.

I grant you that the RP campaign is doing a fine job in making sure that RP supporters show up at straw polls. One can only wonder just how many ‘straw polls’ an individual RP supporter has voted in. Nothing wrong with that, but having a small, dedicated, and committed group of supporters does not equate to having ‘deep support’.


26 posted on 10/14/2007 6:02:54 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Ron Paul is not specifically mentioned in the Constitution either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: WWTD

He has no prayer, no hope, no possibility of ever winning the primaries anywhere. So how can you be so optimistic? He’s a libertarian, not a conservative. One poll does not prove anything.


33 posted on 10/14/2007 6:06:51 AM PDT by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: WWTD
Romney and Hunter both attended this conference,

So, Romney was a conservative this week?

57 posted on 10/14/2007 6:45:57 AM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: WWTD

Ron Paul has a lot of support in these polls.

It just isn’t from conservatives or Republicans.

Perhaps RonPaul and AlGore could team up and run as a third party.


129 posted on 10/14/2007 2:00:49 PM PDT by airborne (Proud to be a conservative! Proud to support Duncan Hunter for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson