Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fisherman describes battle with monster mako shark
NW Forida Daily News ^ | Patrick Rice

Posted on 10/15/2007 2:25:19 AM PDT by jsh3180

DESTIN – Adlee Bruner’s fishing story is about the big one that didn’t get away.

Bruner and five friends headed out Saturday morning on a charter boat, hoping to catch some grouper to enter in the annual Destin Fishing Rodeo.

Instead, Bruner landed a gargantuan 844.4-pound mako shark, setting a new record for the decades-old tournament.

“It was tense,” Bruner, 47, said about the fight to land the 11-foot shark with a mouthful of huge teeth. “I’ve fished for 40 years. I’ve never see one that big.”

Bruner and his fishing buddies were on the 52-foot charter boat “Twilight” with Capt. Robert Hill of Destin and deckhand Eric Hayles.

"We were precisely 70 miles southwest of Destin,” Hill said. “In beautiful blue water. It was about 280 feet deep.”

The fishermen first noticed the big mako because it kept eating grouper and scamp they had hooked.

“I told them to bring up their rigs,” Hill said.

When the rigs came up, the big shark surfaced just behind the boat.

“A huge shark,” Bruner said.

“That was an incredible sight,” Hill said. “You sort of run around not knowing what to do, it was so big.

“It was like ‘Jaws.’ ”

Hill hooked a two-foot amberine on as bait and tossed it out. The rig included a stout fiberglass rod and a Shimano PLD 50 reel custom built at Destin’s Half-Hitch Tackle, with 100-lb. test line and a steel leader.

About 10 minutes after the bait was in the water, at 12:20 p.m., the shark hit about 200 feet from the boat, and the fight was on.

“He went to the bottom for about 30 minutes,” Hill said of the shark. “(Then) it just decided to come up to the surface.”

Bruner was not strapped in to a chair as he battled the huge fish.

“I was standing up the whole time,” he said.

When the shark surfaced, Hill backed the boat up to it. That is when things got tense, Bruner and Hill said.

“My deckhand (Hayles) was the most courageous of all,” Hill said. “He reached out there and gaffed him. He’s the one who knew the fish wasn’t worn down. He’s tough.”

“He went crazy,” Bruner said of the shark. “It was a fight.”

At one point the rope attached to the gaffe wrapped around the boat’s rudder and began to fray. But after 10 minutes they were able to get another rope around the shark’s tail.

“Once we had the tail roped, we had him,” Hill said. Still, it took about an hour for the fish to succumb.

But then a challenge arose.

“We couldn’t get him in the boat,” Bruner said. “We tried for about an hour, but we couldn’t pick him up.”

Eventually, they tied the shark to the stern with three ropes and began the trip back to land.

Hill, who’s been a charter captain since 1985, said his boat ran full out the entire way back, but the journey still took more than four hours to reach Destin Harbor.

The shark was hoisted up at the rodeo before a big crowd. It tipped the scale at 844.4 pounds. After it was gutted, the mako still weighed 638 pounds – breaking the tournament’s previous shark division record by 338 pounds.

Bruner said the shark eclipsed the size of any fish he’s ever caught before.

“I’ve caught an 85-pound Warsaw (grouper) before,” he said. “This is a totally different fish here.”

Bruner, who is self-employed from Bruce, Fla., and has fished many other times with Hill, said it’s also likely the only time he’ll ever land and keep a big shark.

“Ninety-nine percent of the time we catch sharks and let them go. (But) it’s a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.”

Hill concurred.

“This is the biggest thing I’ve ever seen or caught myself.

“Basically, when you have good customers who’ve been fishing for something like this for years, you can’t pass it up.

“We normally catch and release all sharks. This was a special occasion just because of the size. And it was a rodeo record.

“There’s people that fish all their lives and never see anything like that.”


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: Calpernia

Nah. I was up there in early Sept, a little too early, but I did go bluefishing. A fellow I used to mate with (waiting for snide comments...)now has his own party boat and I sailed with him.
Won the pool!!! (it went to the mate)


21 posted on 10/15/2007 5:11:07 AM PDT by Roccus (Someday it'll all make sense.....maybe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Roccus

I thought we would get bluefishing in this season; but my kids haven’t satisfied me with their swimming skills yet.

I hope to get us all out on the party boats next season.

Hopefully, we will make it to the inlet again before it gets too cold this season.


22 posted on 10/15/2007 5:18:03 AM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: jsh3180
“I’m posting this because I’m aghast at the killing of this fish for sport. 844 pounds whole, 638 pounds after being gutted. The picture obviously shows this was a huge female pregnant with many pups. This should be against fishing regulations.”

Scary that someone would be against the killing of a shark for any reason.
Animals are animals, people are people.
Humans were created to be over animals.
Animals a renewable commodity, just like walnuts that fall from a tree.

23 posted on 10/15/2007 5:24:29 AM PDT by HereInTheHeartland (Sometimes the first duty of intelligent men is the restatement of the obvious. Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Slump Tester
For crying out load - it's a SHARK. They're like Dorittos, they'll make more.

Save the shark, kill a lawyer instead.

24 posted on 10/15/2007 5:50:02 AM PDT by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorist savages - In Honor of Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: freeplancer

Environmental conservatism is a conservative principle.

You don’t shoot does or pregnant deer when you go hunting, do you?

Remember, Ronald Reagan wanted to save the whales.


25 posted on 10/15/2007 6:25:08 AM PDT by bleachboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: USS Alaska

Agreed. But, help me out here, how do you tell the difference?


26 posted on 10/15/2007 6:25:58 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: jsh3180

I’ll bet he was thinking about The Great Dimagio as he he was fighting the fish.


27 posted on 10/15/2007 6:32:31 AM PDT by Blogatron (I pitty the devil when hippies start arriving in bunches.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jsh3180

You want to read some crazy stuff? Relink to the actual article and look at the comments. WOW...


28 posted on 10/15/2007 6:33:44 AM PDT by Amalie (FREEDOM had NEVER been another word for nothing left to lose...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bleachboy
You don’t shoot does

Really?

29 posted on 10/15/2007 6:41:42 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: jsh3180

Big fisherman.


30 posted on 10/15/2007 6:57:31 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

That actually should have read “fawns or pregnant does”.

Can someone lend me a cup of coffee?


31 posted on 10/15/2007 7:11:39 AM PDT by bleachboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman
8 oz. per person shark steak
3 tbsp. Dijon mustard
1/2 tsp. honey
Dash of fresh lemon juice
Pepper to taste

I guess its better than

Person
150lbs of person (more or less is OK)
wetsuit (optional-maybe eaten or removed)
surfboard-also optional, watch for fiberglass splinters, which won't bother you you're a shark for chrissakes...
lots of salt water

Catch fresh, eat whole or in bites. Cooking is not needed
Serves 1, may be shared if needed.

32 posted on 10/15/2007 7:13:53 AM PDT by China Clipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Amalie
You want to read some crazy stuff? Relink to the actual article and look at the comments. WOW...

No kidding. My favorite rebuttal to the animal-rights gang:

"The shark is actually the 'bait', not the victim. The sport was to lure whining, bleeding heart PETA vegetarians to chime in with the utter contempt and disdain. That way, the normal people among us could gawk, stare, point, and laugh at their stated and utterly moronic 'feelings'. It certainly appears from the posted comments that it worked."

33 posted on 10/15/2007 7:14:05 AM PDT by Charles Martel (The Tree of Liberty thirsts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel
Awww... Poor thing, what savages. They are mean!

34 posted on 10/15/2007 7:20:48 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks (BUILD THE WALL, ENFORCE THE LAW! ®™ ± ‰¢ ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: jsh3180

As a former surfer/bodyboarder, there aren’t words to express how much I hate sharks. That being said, I fail to see what killing this fish accomplished.


35 posted on 10/15/2007 7:24:17 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks

36 posted on 10/15/2007 7:24:21 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks (BUILD THE WALL, ENFORCE THE LAW! ®™ ± ‰¢ ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: China Clipper

The pups are small enough to filet and grill on the BBQ. Tender and delicious using your spices.


37 posted on 10/15/2007 7:25:19 AM PDT by Broker (Mabuhay!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel
"Agreed. But, help me out here, how do you tell the difference?"

Sharks & shysters for all their shared behavior the first (& best) distinction between the two is visual.
A shark looks like a fish while lawyers appear radically different.

...akin to a leech.

38 posted on 10/15/2007 7:41:31 AM PDT by Landru (finally made it to the dark side of the moon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel
Agreed. But, help me out here, how do you tell the difference?

If it's attacking from the front, it's a shark.

39 posted on 10/15/2007 8:06:12 AM PDT by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorist savages - In Honor of Standing Wolf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: jsh3180
I’m posting this because I’m aghast at the killing of this fish for sport.

There's nothing in this article to indicate that any of these fishermen were lawyers, thus there was no requirement or obligation for them to extend professional courtesy...

40 posted on 10/15/2007 8:18:08 AM PDT by tarheelswamprat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson