I don’t see him as an asset for the VP slot.
Many of his supporters appear to be completely unreasonable, and probably won’t support Fred. Fred won’t take CA. Hunter’s not a strategic benefit as VP.
Hunter’d be lovely as head of Homeland Security. THAT might engender more support for Fred than putting Hunter in the VP slot.
I just know how hard Duncan Hunter works for the right things for our country. I just haven't seen that in Fred. I have heard him speak, and he says the right things...I just haven't heard any of the "he's done this, and he's done that," that I know to be the case with HUNTER.
You're probably right though...many would wonder if you had a guy that's rumored to not work so hard combined with someone who's DEFINITELY got a fire under his behind and makes good use of every minute of the day...could be trouble in the White House. Secretary of Defense - Head of Homeland Security - all solid citizen, "action" type positions would fit HUNTER to a tee.
That's why all that support him, don't understand why POTUS isn't everyone's first choice for Hunter.