Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gene Eric
The cost to the employees would be much greater outside the group plan and would in turn force salaries upwards, create ill-will, and an attraction to competing organizations that offer such benefits.

This is exactly why "big business" is in favor of a government-run health care system. The purpose of a government run health care system is not to provide coverage to everyone who doesn't have insurance . . . it's to reduce the cost (by reducing the quality) of insurance for those who are already covered in a manner that gives them: 1) no incentive to shop around for a different job that offers a better insurance plan; and 2) no mechanism to complain about it (since it will be run by a massive, anonymous bureaucracy).

97 posted on 10/18/2007 3:31:59 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

>> This is exactly why “big business” is in favor of a government-run health care system.

And don’t forget that the tax payer picks up the health care costs of “big business” and its employees. Investors foreign and domestic reap the windfall on the back of the tax payer.

It’s a nasty thing on so many levels.

BTW, “It’s for the children” is a red herring. The children of today will suffer tomorrow en masse if the gov’t takes over the America’s health care. The iron fist is good for beating an enemy, and moving envelopes; but, for precision neurological surgery, mammograms, and handling beakers, it’s incapable, too clumsy, and inevitably indifferent.


209 posted on 10/18/2007 5:38:02 PM PDT by Gene Eric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson