Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

City Hikes Boy Scouts' Rent by $199,999 over Gay Ban (Philadelphia)
Philadelphia Inquirer ^ | 10/18/2007 | Joseph A. Slobodzian

Posted on 10/18/2007 9:41:25 AM PDT by Pyro7480

The Boy Scouts of America's refusal to bend its rules to permit gay scouts will cost the organization's local chapter $200,000 a year if it wishes to keep its headquarters in a city-owned building on Logan Square.

Representatives of the Boy Scouts of America's Cradle of Liberty Council were notified that to remain in their 79-year-old landmark headquarters, they needed to pay the city a "fair market" rent, Fairmount Park Commission president Robert N.C. Nix said yesterday. Currently, the rent is $1 a year....

(Excerpt) Read more at philly.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: ban; boyscouts; bsa; childmolesters; discrimination; gaystapotactics; homofascism; homosexualagenda; homosexuals; jerks; lawsuit; moralabsolutes; philadelphia; politicalcorrectness; scouting; scouts; stalinism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 401-409 next last
To: trumandogz
I own commercial property and all the improvements done to my property by a tenant becomes my property.

You're leaving out the part where the tenants negotiate their lease and the amount of rent they will pay in consideration of the improvements. The Scouts did this when they negotiated the lease in perpetuity, which the City is now breaking to please the homosexual City Solicitor. So if your marvelous property were rented to, say, IBM, and you broke your contract, your a$$ would be hauled into court and you would pay big time. But the Scouts, being non-profit, are over a barrel, and will need to cut programs for the poor and disadvantaged youngsters in order to meet your standards of commercial perfection. Congratulations. Hope it all continues to work out for you. Hope you never have any property that remains vacant and gets vandalized because your terms are so unreasonable that no one will rent from you. Tenancy is a relationship. The owner should never have all the power. That is tyranny.

301 posted on 10/18/2007 12:28:37 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (America: “the most benign hegemon in history.”—Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

I have a dog who they said would never be any good in the show ring because she was not interested and her ears stayed down no matter what I did short of surgery which is a no no on the particular breed until she was eight months old. I knew what was wrong. She is just a big dog and her ear flaps were just heavy as heck. The point is if I had stopped and listened to those stupids who spoke in the negative probably because they were jealous nothing would have ever happened. Well her ears are up and she is not only a domestic champion twice; she is an international champion. See, I believe in my dog. She is a massive female with great confirmation. She doesn’t like the ring; but with the right trainer/handler she is dynamite in the ring. So is her sister; like an angel going around the ring. You got to learn to pick out the gold. Yes, there are people that want to destroy this country; but there are better and more determined that want to keep America free. Stand strong in what you believe. It’s not always going to go your way; but if you don’t deter; it will one day.

I have always believed this. I ain’t getting paid to be harrassed by anyone. Now, if they want to pay me big bucks; I may listen. LOL


302 posted on 10/18/2007 12:29:11 PM PDT by freekitty ((May the eagles long fly our beautiful and free American sky.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
"The Scouts built the building, then donated it to the City. That is the value exchanged — the property, especially in that location, is worth many millions. In addition, they pay various other licensing and utility fees."

I wonder, that since at the time the scouts build the building, then donated it (and the land?) to the city in exchange for a payment of one dollar/yr. “in perpetuity” (probably to avoid taxes) that since the city wants to negate this agreement, should not the building and land be returned to the scouts as a result of this act.

I would think that the public should get on board and tell the city to give it back to the scouts.

Sounds like an issue that should be voted on, rather than the city spending taxpayers money on lawyers.

303 posted on 10/18/2007 12:29:28 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

Can I quote you on that, Mayor Street?


304 posted on 10/18/2007 12:29:38 PM PDT by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
The city cannot legally continue renting to an organization that discriminates

That is clearly not the case. The city has offered to rent to the Scouts for $200,000/year. So clearly, the issue is not legal prohibitions against renting city land to organizations who "discriminate". Something else is at play here.

305 posted on 10/18/2007 12:31:02 PM PDT by been_lurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: Tired of Taxes
So, there are people in the BSA who are taking advantage of everything the organization offers, but they don't really share the values.

I went through the same thing 15 years ago in Philly in Scouts. One mother was a schoolteacher who wanted to bring a banana and a condom when the kids were around 10 years old. She was outvoted. Another was a male artist of some renown who was an atheist and who eventually removed his kid because of his objections to the moral values.

Unfortunately, in the City, mostly mothers ran the Boy Scout packs because there were so few fathers around, even among the professional lawyer/doctor class. But we did have a couple of good fathers who did stand up for what was right and wouldn't go along with nonsense. But that was 15 years ago, before the level of Christian-hatred has escalated as it now has.

306 posted on 10/18/2007 12:37:54 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (America: “the most benign hegemon in history.”—Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: been_lurking
That is clearly not the case. The city has offered to rent to the Scouts for $200,000/year. So clearly, the issue is not legal prohibitions against renting city land to organizations who "discriminate". Something else is at play here

I wasn't as clear as I should have been. According to the article the city can't continue to rent to an organization that discriminates at the dollar per year it had been charging. Apparently it can rent to anyone so long as they're paying fair market.

307 posted on 10/18/2007 12:40:48 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Apparently it can rent to anyone so long as they're paying fair market.

So "discrimination" is illegal at $1.00/year, but perfectly legal at $200,000/year. Do you still think "discrimination" is the issue in this case?

Perhaps "discrimination" is the City's excuse in this case.

308 posted on 10/18/2007 12:49:55 PM PDT by been_lurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
From the story it doesn't sound like that was the situation.

"The land belongs to the City of Philadelphia but has been leased since 1928 for that token sum to the scouts, who built the landmark Beaux Arts building."

Sounds more like the Scouts were looking to build a headquarters back in the 1920's and the city came along and offered them the site for a buck as a way of supporting scouting. Unfortunately things change and the Scouts got caught up in it.

309 posted on 10/18/2007 12:51:22 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: rahbert
sounds like the vermin are inhabiting City Hall.

And have been for many, many decades. Philadelphia is utterly corrupt, from the sleazy working-class wardheelers fixing parking tickets to the retirees on City disability pensions spending their days free-lancing, or the hundreds of thousands avoiding taxes by working "under the table", to the outright wheeling and dealing of the Democrat machine politicians.

Until recently, there was an overall public hypocrisy about being good Catholics, staunch Episcopalians or righteous Jews. Not any more. The influx of gays into City Hall started in the 80s and has proceeded apace. One City manager my workplace dealt with told me she only hired other lesbians and gays. Imagine if a heterosexual City manager told someone he only hired men, or only hired straights.

Remember, Philadelphia is the City that gave us Abscam, a bribery scandal uncovered by the FBI, in which Rep. John Murtha was involved, but never indicted.

310 posted on 10/18/2007 12:53:21 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (America: “the most benign hegemon in history.”—Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

Hi TommyDale.


311 posted on 10/18/2007 12:57:02 PM PDT by freekitty ((May the eagles long fly our beautiful and free American sky.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
You and I may believe that the Boy Scouts are a good cause and deserve free rent.
Other people my believe that the Girl Scouts are a good cause and deserve free rent.
Other people may believe that the ACLU is a good cause and deserve free rent.
And some people may believe that NAMBLA is a good cause and deserver free rent.

Your post is indicitive of the Marxist/collectivist mindset that has overtaken this nation. Under FEDERALISM, communities get to have a say in what they consider COMMUNITY VALUES, such as not allowing a peepshow on the same block with a battered-women's shelter. Not all law should come from the Supreme Court and force every community to bow to the ACLU, although that seems to be where you're heading with your one-size-fits-all logic.

312 posted on 10/18/2007 12:57:56 PM PDT by Albion Wilde (America: “the most benign hegemon in history.”—Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde

Now there you go letting reason get in the way of ideological purity. Shame on you.


313 posted on 10/18/2007 1:00:11 PM PDT by The Pack Knight (Duty, Honor, Country.... Valor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

I can empathize with you on that. But, what goes around comes around and they will get theirs and it won’t be pretty.

Which brings me to God and ACLU. They want to pretend to go all intellectual on you about God; like man is somehow greater than God. Well, sorry suckers; but God is faith. He is in your heart and soul.

In other words, God is not an intellectual discussion.


314 posted on 10/18/2007 1:01:25 PM PDT by freekitty ((May the eagles long fly our beautiful and free American sky.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: been_lurking
So "discrimination" is illegal at $1.00/year, but perfectly legal at $200,000/year. Do you still think "discrimination" is the issue in this case?

Yes. By charging a buck a year the city is seen as supporting an organization that legally discriminates. By charging fair market value for the rent they they're treating the Boy Scouts the same as anyone else, no better and no worse. That seems to be the legal issue here.

315 posted on 10/18/2007 1:02:51 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde
You are correct. The values in Philadelphia are likely not the same as they would be in Salt Lake City or Tuscaloosa. Therefore, the City Council of Philadelphia should be able to decide if the Boy Scouts do or do not meet the city's discrimination policies.

If in fact the Boy Scouts do not meet the city's standard on discrimination then the city has the right to evict or to raise the rent.

316 posted on 10/18/2007 1:09:32 PM PDT by trumandogz (Hunter Thompson 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
the city is seen as supporting

Interesting choice of words you used.

You seem to be saying that this is not a "legal" issue, but instead is an issue of the City's "appearance". Nothing legally forbids the City from a $1.00/year rent, it just "appears" wrong.

If that is correct, then the Scouts may actually have legal recourse.

317 posted on 10/18/2007 1:14:25 PM PDT by been_lurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

“Exactly. Why are the Boy Scouts on Welfare?”

You go to camp with the scouts you have, not the scouts you wished you had.


318 posted on 10/18/2007 1:18:28 PM PDT by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_no_exceptions
OTOH, as a private organization, what makes them entitled to free government office space?

At one time in our culture, organizations which promoted the honest and moral development of young men into manhood and roles of leadership were so revered they were offered the use of buildings and office space for token amounts.

Now they are decried from the rooftops by those not fit to shine their shoes.

I was a Boy Scout, and I learned a lot. Those lessons apply throughout life.

It is a pity Philadelphia has chosen to attempt to extort a change in policy this way, after all it isn't about the rent, it is about the Boy Scouts saying "No." to homosexuals sharing a tent with someone's boy out in the boonies...

319 posted on 10/18/2007 1:20:40 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: been_lurking
You seem to be saying that this is not a "legal" issue, but instead is an issue of the City's "appearance". Nothing legally forbids the City from a $1.00/year rent, it just "appears" wrong.

Read the article: "Unlike the scouts, public officials are also bound by a line of Supreme Court opinions barring taxpayer support of any group that discriminates." Charging under fair market rent constitutes supporting the group that is discriminating. Charging fair market rent is not. So it sounds like the city legally can't cut the scouts any slack.

320 posted on 10/18/2007 1:23:29 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 401-409 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson