To: Responsibility2nd
Sounds like some general has let his Politically Correct Napoleonic ego go to his damn head.
I disagree with this order and it really does make me angry.
4 posted on
10/19/2007 2:13:31 PM PDT by
OKIEDOC
(Kalifornia, a red state wannabe. I don't take Ex Lax I just read the New York Times.)
To: OKIEDOC
I disagree with this order and it really does make me angry It was a standard order when I was in. Didn't bother me.
8 posted on
10/19/2007 2:20:28 PM PDT by
chesty_puller
(70-73 USMC VietNam 75-79 US Army Wash DC....VietNam was safer.)
To: OKIEDOC
1961-1981, We could only travel to and from home.
NO getting out of car for any reason.
I don’t understand your problem with this order.
33 posted on
10/19/2007 3:07:50 PM PDT by
TaMoDee
To: OKIEDOC
I don’t think we were ever supposed to wear utilities off base. This order doesn’t appear to change any rule so much as it eliminates some informal exceptions which appear to have crept in. Maybe the article isn’t clear, but Marine service and dress uniforms are deemed appropriate for off-base wear.
To: OKIEDOC
84 posted on
10/20/2007 3:24:02 AM PDT by
Beckwith
(dhimmicrats and the liberal media have .chosen sides -- Islamofascism)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson