His views are the logical conclusion of evolutionists; just that he is willing to say it out loud.
sobieski wrote: “His views are the logical conclusion of evolutionists; just that he is willing to say it out loud.”
Agreed. Survival of the fittest, right? If we are only machines, without a soul, why keep a defective one around?
His views are completely contrary to evolutionary theory. Under evolutionary theory, natural selection is the decider. He is advocating that man be the decider. That's not consistent with the theory or Darwin's personal views. In fact, it would turn natural selection on its head.