Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance

>>>>Without the exercise of Mitt Romney’s executive authority, there would still be NO gay “marriage” in Massachusetts to this day.<<<<

How’s that lawsuit of yours coming? I suppose those gay marriage occurring in Mass are still un-Constitutional, eh? Screw the courts, common law, and Marbury v. Madison, right?

You are so full of it. I don’t know how many times you have to be set down in your place before you quit repeating the same nonsense. Or perhaps you’ve come up with an explanation of how those marriage certificates were issued in Iowa?


12 posted on 10/20/2007 5:30:59 PM PDT by CheyennePress (Non Abbiamo Bisogno)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: CheyennePress

Marbury vs. Madison says that the courts are subject to the Constitution. I guess your professors excised out that part.


13 posted on 10/20/2007 5:48:19 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (With "Republicans" like this, who needs Democrats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson