Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I AM being objective.
1 posted on 10/20/2007 11:17:12 PM PDT by mission9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SandRat; Reganesque; Joe Brower; jimrob; Crackingham; CharlesWayneCT; Brilliant; Waverunner; ...

Wish you were here.


2 posted on 10/20/2007 11:21:27 PM PDT by mission9 (Be a citizen worth living for, in a Nation worth dying for...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mission9
"The tone of the event was established by Governor Charlie Crist, and Party Chairman Greer, the party brass at the auditorium luncheon. Their message was that we must emerge from this primary united to fully support the Party nominee, otherwise, the Democrats will win, and we may lose the White House for a generation."

Smells suspiciously like a pitch for Rudy the abortionist liberal. Yeah, I saw this chairman guy on FOX yesterday pitching the same liberal garbage. Sorry. No sale. Abortionists need not apply.

4 posted on 10/20/2007 11:31:10 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Our God-given unalienable rights are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mission9

I AM being objective.
.........

Not really. Too much gushing over Mitt.

Your post #14 on this thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1913016/posts

“I have come to the same conclusion. I have watched both Rudy and Romney campaign in person. Thompson is a no-show. Romney has presidential charisma, he has the resources and I agree with him on virtually every issue.”

Mitt seems like a computer generated candidate and has mean eyes.


6 posted on 10/20/2007 11:44:04 PM PDT by barker ( A smile is a curved line that sets things straight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mission9
"I AM being objective."

That statement combined with your gushing over Mitt makes You a total Liar!
8 posted on 10/21/2007 12:03:09 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mission9

“Fred emphasized that we need a workable immigration policy, and control of our borders with new technology.”

“workable immigration policy” ???
“new technology” ???

I’m tired of the B.S. rhetoric...spell it out clearly...less than the following is unacceptable, and few candidates will do so...

ATTRITION THROUGH ENFORCEMENT OF OUR CURRENT IMMIGRATION LAWS

NO AMNESTY OF ANY KIND FOR ANY ILLEGAL ALIENS

EFFECTIVELY SECURE THE BORDERS WITH A DOUBLE FENCE AS THE LAW PROVIDES IN DUNCAN HUNTER’S BILL.


18 posted on 10/21/2007 1:51:02 AM PDT by Kimberly GG (Support Duncan Hunter in YOUR State....http://duncanhunter.meetup.com/1/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NautiNurse
Ping! Your observations could contribute to this article. Hope all is well - all clear in the Caribbean this AM! Nearly past the "Wilma" mark...
19 posted on 10/21/2007 3:05:49 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Folks remember the GOP PRIMARY decides the presidential election.

A Giuliani win creates a “40 yard penalty” of either third party suicide run and/or people staying home. It is guaranteed Giuliani will NOT get donations or money from values voters. No volunteers.

These debates matter because whe essentially are interviewing Thompson and Romney for the job.

The others are just window dressing. No insult to the remaining candidates. (well maybe a little insult to ronpaul) If hunter had blipped like huckabee he might have had a chance but his campaign is DOA.

Look for Giuliani to use his lawyer zingers to emphasise “I beat clinton by attacking the line item veto”, “I was mayor on 9/11” and “only candidate who can reach to moderates”.

No Giuliani, No Problem

No Giuliani, No Problem.


24 posted on 10/21/2007 5:45:45 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mission9

What do they mean “for those who paid”? What the heck does that mean?


27 posted on 10/21/2007 6:15:08 AM PDT by freekitty ((May the eagles long fly our beautiful and free American sky.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; wku man; SLB; ...
Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!
30 posted on 10/21/2007 6:26:57 AM PDT by Joe Brower (Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JulieRNR21; kinganamort; katherineisgreat; floriduh voter; summer; Goldwater Girl; windchime; ...
Florida Freeper


33 posted on 10/21/2007 6:29:25 AM PDT by Joe Brower (Sheep have three speeds: "graze", "stampede" and "cower".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mission9

Great summation. Thank you.

I love Romney.

For the record, and obviously I’m not running for president, but I absolutely used to be pro abortion and pro gay marriage. Through knowledge, understanding, maturity and my faith I have come to clearly see that those are stands that do NOT align w/ my God and good moral standing. I have no problem that Romney has changed his stance.


38 posted on 10/21/2007 8:09:19 AM PDT by spacejunkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson