IWO??? I gave examples of areas/issues of federal government action were your clown prince has made idiot pronoucement on the Constitution were these federal actions have been accepted by Thomas and other constructionist Justices, with NO CHALLENGE at all. You can also throw in drug regulation and federal regulation of partial birth abortion, and.... well you get the point and that’s why you won’t deal with it.
I have never seen an example of Clarence Thomas disagreeing with Ron Paul on Constitutional issues. Can you give me one? Justice Thomas disagrees with the constitution basis of many of the laws currently in effect, but expresses that opinion only when those issues are brought before the Court.
As far as “drug regulation” goes, the federal government claims authorithy to regulate drugs under the New Deal “substantial effects” doctrine. Clarence Thomas is well on record as considering this an illegitimate exercise of federal authority under the Commerce Clause.