“So what is his next rule breaking going to be, even less campaigning and debate preparation?”
When he doesn’t seem to be campaigning, he is doing private events with no reporters there. Fundraisers you know? The things that get you knocked out if you don’t do enough? Also, he does plenty of debate preparation. He was a lawyer and a prosecutor and you can’t go in front of a jury unprepared. He was a successful lawyer and prosecutor. His campaign staff has talked about all of his debate preparation. That too, is something you cannot do with reporters hanging around to report on it.
First debate, an organization was fact checking and the info Fred gave was factually correct while Guiliani and Romney made errors.
So what is your beef? It is obvious he is doing plenty of debate preparation. He isn’t funding his own campaign, so all the money he raises is from supporters. That’s a plus.
If you read the book Marie by Peter Maas, that was one of the things that impressed Marie Ragghianti about him, he went through several feet high stacks of papers that she brought in, and mastered the content himself. Presented it to the jury, won the case, the governor lost. He didn’t give it to a staffer to do. Some staffers in Washington had to work late [until midnight] because Fred was still there in the office working. He worked some staff so hard they quit to find an easier job and had trouble keeping up with Fred.
Your argument is a lazy freeper argument, you didn’t do your homework.
That is the issue, Fred needs to do well enough in his campaign so that he stands out...preferably for the better!