Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jackpot or Mistake? Man Sues Casino over $1.6 Million 'Jackpot'
ABC News ^ | Oct. 25, 2007 | JIM AVILA, BETH TRIBOLET,DONNA CHOI and SCOTT MICHELS

Posted on 10/25/2007 6:20:52 AM PDT by Anti-Bubba182

For about an hour last August, Gary Hoffman was a very lucky man.

Hoffman was playing the nickel slot machines at the Sandia Resort and Casino on an Indian reservation in New Mexico, when he appeared to hit the jackpot: the machine said he won nearly $1.6 million.

"I became ecstatic," he said.

But the ecstasy was short-lived. Hoffman says in a lawsuit filed earlier this year that Sandia refused to pay, claiming that the machine malfunctioned. Instead, he said, they gave him about $385 and a few free meals at the casino.[snip].....

[snip]Regardless, a jury may never get chance to hear Hoffman's case. Native American tribes, as independent nations, have their own court systems and can be sued in state courts only under limited circumstances. New Mexico law generally does not allow tribes to be sued in a state court over a contract dispute, Kleiman said.....

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cantevenbreakeven; casino; geronimosrevenge; indiangivers; scams
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-103 next last
Sovereign Immunity for the tribes is total BS. They are a bunch of glorified welfare clients. Big business bought themselves a piece to run casinos and screw the public over and above the normal house percentage.
1 posted on 10/25/2007 6:20:54 AM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

I always wonder when it says ‘malfunction voids all pays’.

How would a player know if it’s really a malfunction or just the Casino not paying? Many jackpots are probably not paid using this excuse.


2 posted on 10/25/2007 6:23:56 AM PDT by varyouga ("Rove is some mysterious God of politics & mind control" - DU 10-24-06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
I’ve read that under Federal law/Federal court rulings any dispute you have with an Indian casino is settled under tribal law,not under Federal law or under the laws of the state in which this casino is located.
3 posted on 10/25/2007 6:25:37 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Wanna see how bad it can get? Elect Hillary and find out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

The more they play these games the more bad publicity they generate and the less it is that people will spend their money there.


4 posted on 10/25/2007 6:27:18 AM PDT by misterrob (Seven down, 12 more til the Pats win the SB again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Could be. If I went to a casino I would not go to an Indian one.


5 posted on 10/25/2007 6:27:39 AM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
Been hearing this more and more regards "indian" casinos. Friends won't go now to them since they say it ruins the experience knowing that if you hit, they won't pay. Also, nothing you can do, they are beyond the law were the casinos are concerned.

What to do? Stay away. Play at places where a regulatory body responsible to the public controls how the casino is operated.

6 posted on 10/25/2007 6:28:58 AM PDT by cb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
Could be. If I went to a casino I would not go to an Indian one.

Outside of Nevada and New Jersey where are you gonna find a non-Indian casino?

7 posted on 10/25/2007 6:29:47 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Wanna see how bad it can get? Elect Hillary and find out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

If the casino does not end up making a better offer to this person they risk alienating a number of potential gamblers. From a PR campaign perspective, it would be bad business to not settle this more favorably.


8 posted on 10/25/2007 6:29:49 AM PDT by LRoggy (Peter's Son's Business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

Indian givers?.............


9 posted on 10/25/2007 6:30:08 AM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: varyouga

The machine has a disclaimer saying the max payout is $2500. I’d say a message telling you you’ve won over a million is a pretty good indicator of a malfunction.

That being said, I guess the best move is to gamble in the United States, not on an Indian Reservation.


10 posted on 10/25/2007 6:30:15 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Mississippi, Louisiana......


11 posted on 10/25/2007 6:30:42 AM PDT by Red Badger ( We don't have science, but we have consensus.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
The idiots in Seattle turned down allowing slot machines in taverns. They said they didn’t want children exposed to gambling.

OK, absurd as that is with a state that has a lottery, here’s what happened.

Those slot machines would only have gone into the type of taverns that already had pull tabs, a form of gambling, not your high-class, family-type restaurants. The antis also didn’t want gambling in their neighborhood.

But here’s the real catcher: the Indians can build casinos only on ‘reservation’ land. So what they do is buy up a few buildings on a block and donate it to the ‘reservation.’ Voila, instant (FULL) gambling where they want it.

I don’t gamble and really don’t care for it. But allowing slots in taverns where they are already allowed to gamble would have put the first chink in the armor of an absurd, tax-free enterprise on lands where the people COULD IMPLEMENT SHARIA LAW, if they so choose.

The people lost. The Indians won. Their casinos continue to pop up. The idiots in Seattle think they won something. Glad I left.

12 posted on 10/25/2007 6:31:17 AM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Liberals are blind. They are the dupes of Leftists who know exactly what they're doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Indiana has at least 4


13 posted on 10/25/2007 6:32:13 AM PDT by wordsofearnest (Thompson-Hunter not Hunter Thompson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: varyouga
I always wonder when it says ‘malfunction voids all pays’.
How would a player know if it’s really a malfunction or just the Casino not paying?

Monty Python had an insurance sketch in which a man has an accident, goes to his insurance broker who acts very, very sympathetic, but does reveal that the man purchased a "No Payment Policy" which says that no matter what happens to the man, the insurance company doesn't have to pay him. So sorry.

14 posted on 10/25/2007 6:33:23 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The broken wall, the burning roof and tower. And Agamemnon dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

Given this, you’d have to be an idiot to play at one of those casinos.


15 posted on 10/25/2007 6:34:08 AM PDT by FormerLib (Sacrificing our land and our blood cannot buy protection from jihad.-Bishop Artemije of Kosovo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
Outside of Nevada and New Jersey where are you gonna find a non-Indian casino?

There are three major non-Indian casinos on the Ohio River in southern Indiana.

16 posted on 10/25/2007 6:34:52 AM PDT by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

This guy is an ass hat .. the same type of malfunctions occur in Vegas Casinos and guess what ... they don’t pay off for the malfunction either ... he should have taken the $2500 ...

now he gets squat ..


17 posted on 10/25/2007 6:35:25 AM PDT by SubGeniusX (The People have UNENUMERATED RIGHTS ... the Govt. does NOT have UNENUMERATED POWERS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Many states have casinos not run by Indians

Mississippi, Louisiana, Missouri, Iowa, South Dakota (Deadwood), Illinois, Indiana, West Virginia (slots only)....

Probably missing a few, but you can avoid the Indian casinos w/out having to go to Vegas or Jersey


18 posted on 10/25/2007 6:35:29 AM PDT by UCFRoadWarrior (FantasyCollegeBlitz.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Better yet, get an actual life instead of spending time feeding nickles into a machine that will give you back part of them.


19 posted on 10/25/2007 6:36:06 AM PDT by tickmeister (tickmeister)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

Sovereign Immunity sure does not work for tax free tobacco sales.


20 posted on 10/25/2007 6:38:42 AM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

I was thinking that a $1.6 million payout on nickel slots seems extremely unlikely - they just don’t have jackpots that big on nickel slots.


21 posted on 10/25/2007 6:40:54 AM PDT by -YYZ- (Strong like bull, smart like ox.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
They also don't have to obey municipal fire codes, etc.

There was quite an article in the local paper last year pointing violations out; fire inspectors said they'd shut Fantasy Springs down if they could - improper exit signs, lack of safety "push" doors and that sort of thing.

22 posted on 10/25/2007 6:41:55 AM PDT by ErnBatavia (...forward this to your 10 very best friends....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: UCFRoadWarrior
...Probably missing a few.... Add Delaware. Slots only.
23 posted on 10/25/2007 6:42:05 AM PDT by bobsatwork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
Could be. If I went to a casino I would not go to an Indian one.

I play the home version:
1. Take your money in one hand.
2. Throw it over your shoulder.

That way, my wife and kids always win.

24 posted on 10/25/2007 6:43:04 AM PDT by magslinger (I will not submit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Pennsylvania (slots only) and West Virginia which just added table games.


25 posted on 10/25/2007 6:43:36 AM PDT by Ditto (Global Warming: The 21st Century's Snake Oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o

Louisiana, Mississippi, and New Jersey. Some on the Ohio river, Illinois I think, I believe I’d heard of casinos in Michigan.


26 posted on 10/25/2007 6:44:02 AM PDT by American_Centurion (No, I don't trust the government to automatically do the right thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

I actually agree with the casino. The max jackpot on the machine was $2500 and states as such. The machine showed he won $1.6M. Not the same as if the machine was able to pay that amount.


27 posted on 10/25/2007 6:45:17 AM PDT by DemEater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tickmeister
Ding Ding Ding we have a winner.
28 posted on 10/25/2007 6:46:36 AM PDT by az_illini (Freedom is the freedom to say two + two make four. If that is granted, all else follows-G. Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: DemEater
"The max jackpot on the machine was $2500 and states as such".... Why didn't the casino give the guy $2500? Makes me wonder if was a complete malfunction; maybe the guy didn't hit the jackpot AT ALL, but the "you win" lights went off anyway.
29 posted on 10/25/2007 6:49:24 AM PDT by bobsatwork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: bobsatwork

They offered him the max payout. Apparently he refused it.


30 posted on 10/25/2007 6:55:34 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: DemEater
I actually agree with the casino. The max jackpot on the machine was $2500 and states as such.

In order for me to accept that there would have to be big signs at every entrance of the casino warning that each and every slot machine has a posted maximum payout and that maximum is posted,very prominently,on each machine.The warning would have to further state that *any* payout displayed by a machine that exceeds that machine's posted max will not be honored.

The key to my statement is...no "fine print".The warnings must be large and must be found all over the casino...including on each machine.In fact,each machine must be set up to require that a player respond to some prompt from the machine informing each player of the limits rule and the response must be "I understand and accept these rules".

31 posted on 10/25/2007 6:57:41 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Wanna see how bad it can get? Elect Hillary and find out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

A glitch? What the rigged machined didn’t work as it was supposed to? Perhaps they should go back to weighted dice. The casino is responsible for its machines. It should have insurance to cover liablilty of gliches.

Think about it the other way: if you gambled with money you didn’t have (perhaps a bad check that initally passed), would the casino accept an excuse about a glitch in calculating your bank balance? Or would they take you out back and scalp you?

Additionally, the bank error analogy is erroueous since there was not a wager placed to win that amount.


32 posted on 10/25/2007 6:57:45 AM PDT by Barney Gumble (A liberal is someone too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel - Robert Frost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: varyouga
How would a player know if it’s really a malfunction or just the Casino not paying? Many jackpots are probably not paid using this excuse.

Exactly. The definition of a win should be when the machine displays a win, malfunction or no, unless it can be proven that the player tampered with the machine. It is the responsibility of the casino the ensure that the slot machines are working properly.

33 posted on 10/25/2007 7:01:40 AM PDT by sportutegrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
Gambling is a tax on the mathematically disinclined anyway. They can only ‘screw the public over’ if the public is stupid enough to gamble away their money at their casino.

I agree with the posters who say that NOT paying out the jackpot will probably cost the casino more in bad publicity and lost revenue than just paying it.

Also, a treaty is a treaty. If we granted them Sovereign Immunity, then they have Sovereign Immunity. Don’t like it? Stay off the reservation.

34 posted on 10/25/2007 7:01:44 AM PDT by allmendream (A binary modality is a sure sign you don't understand the problem. (Hunter 08))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tickmeister
Better yet, get an actual life instead of spending time feeding nickles into a machine that will give you back part of them.

I'm inclined to agree.I've been to Vegas before (because I was dating a girl who lived there) and I've been to Foxwoods and Mohegan Sun once (I was driving by).In the several visits I've made to casinos in my life I've wagered less than $5...and lost all of it.Lotteries and casinos were designed for those who flunked math.

35 posted on 10/25/2007 7:02:49 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Wanna see how bad it can get? Elect Hillary and find out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

You could certianly try to idiot proof it, but the world builds better idiots every day.


36 posted on 10/25/2007 7:04:59 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Barney Gumble

There was no wager placed to win $1.6 million either. He placed a wager to win $2,500.


37 posted on 10/25/2007 7:05:59 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

He should sue the slot manufacturer, IGT. A billion-dallar company might pay off just to avoid the bad publicity.


38 posted on 10/25/2007 7:06:10 AM PDT by The people have spoken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

If they have sovereign immunity how come they get to vote in US elections?


39 posted on 10/25/2007 7:06:34 AM PDT by Menehune56 (Oderint Dum Metuant (Let them hate, so long as they fear - Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Indian givers?.............

LOL. great post.

40 posted on 10/25/2007 7:06:42 AM PDT by Between the Lines (I am very cognizant of my fallibility, sinfulness, and other limitations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

I’m betting (pun) the tribe in question pays out the amount in an out of court settlement.

Thats the smart move from a business viewpoint. Casino’s that get the rep they don’t pay when they lose don’t survive.


41 posted on 10/25/2007 7:11:33 AM PDT by Badeye ('Ron Paul joined 88 Democrats.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
The machine has a $2500 max pay out disclaimer. Regardless of tribal law I think the casino is safe.
42 posted on 10/25/2007 7:18:00 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks (BUILD THE WALL, ENFORCE THE LAW! ®™ ± ‰¢ ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

This isn’t the first time they have ripped of patrons. They should have to post a big advertisenment stating “We are Indian givers”


43 posted on 10/25/2007 7:20:40 AM PDT by ThisLittleLightofMine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

“If I went to a casino I would not go to an Indian one.”

Agreed. First few casinos I ever visited were Indian casinos. Later I visited Vegas and disovered the Indian casinos I had been to were dumps in comparison.


44 posted on 10/25/2007 7:24:15 AM PDT by Bogtrotter52 (Reading DU daily so you won't hafta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: varyouga

In PA, there have been MANY times jackpots were reneged on. They say the machine was not ready to pay. That’s like saying the dealer gave out too many aces so we won’t pay. This is only one of the reasons the slots will fail in PA>


45 posted on 10/25/2007 7:28:00 AM PDT by Safetgiver (So simple, even a Muslim can do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
There was no wager placed to win $1.6 million either. He placed a wager to win $2,500.

I think it depends then on how prominent the Max $2500 sign is. If it is easily noticed, then the guy doesn't have a case, but if it is hideen of the machine, then guy wouldn't know what the max is.

46 posted on 10/25/2007 7:29:28 AM PDT by Barney Gumble (A liberal is someone too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel - Robert Frost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

Methinks the whole “malfunction” thing is just a BS excuse to not pay up.

A legit malfunction voids the payout...but how does one prove it did or did not “malfunction?”

A malfunction is probably simply a malfunction in the casino’s bank account and their desire to part with the cash.


47 posted on 10/25/2007 7:30:58 AM PDT by RockinRight (The Council on Illuminated Foreign Masons told me to watch you from my black helicopter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemEater

In this case then it’s different but in other similar cases I’ve heard, I would say the casino was screwing around not wanting to pay.


48 posted on 10/25/2007 7:32:56 AM PDT by RockinRight (The Council on Illuminated Foreign Masons told me to watch you from my black helicopter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: -YYZ-

Even nickel machines can be part of progressive jackpot pools.

There was a payout of $7.8 million on a nickel machine in Reno, on Jan. 27.


49 posted on 10/25/2007 7:38:43 AM PDT by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Pennsylvania!! Mt. Airy in the Poconos and Harrah’s? in Chester Pa .


50 posted on 10/25/2007 7:41:41 AM PDT by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson