Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
The government has a number of options. The land needed for the border fence can simply be "taken" with compensation set by the court in case the landowner rejects the offer.
Alternatively, the government can go to court with counterclaims regarding the location of the boundary. There the landowner stands a chance of losing any compensation at all.
Another option would be to build the fence AROUND the distrungled property owner conveniently leaving him on the Mexican side (with no entrance into the US).
Of all the solutions possible I prefer moving the border to the North. If these guys don't want to play ball with the US, then the US shouldnt play ball with them.
2 posted on
10/27/2007 10:26:47 AM PDT by
muawiyah
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Time for some use the old-fashioned imminent domaining.
4 posted on
10/27/2007 10:29:20 AM PDT by
tailgunner
(Conservative-Libertarian-Confederate-American)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Uhh, last I heard they were not planning to build the fence across the roads at the Ports of Entry. Sooooo, just what other cross border traffic is being discussed?
5 posted on
10/27/2007 10:32:04 AM PDT by
TLI
( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Why this is even news is beyond me. A bunch of mexican surnamed folks don’t want to follow the law of the land?
How freakin surprising is that?
6 posted on
10/27/2007 10:34:35 AM PDT by
bill1952
("all that we do is done with an eye towards something else." - Aristotle)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
"And now they are trying to move the border further north than established by treaty." What is that about? If some of our land is in Mexico, let's go take it and build the fence there!
7 posted on
10/27/2007 10:37:30 AM PDT by
Tai_Chung
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
The entire demographics, and thus destiny, of the U.S. must be transformed so that a few landowners not be bothered with a fence bordering their property.
8 posted on
10/27/2007 10:37:34 AM PDT by
Plutarch
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
"I think it's blood money, bribery," said Brownsville Mayor Patricio M. Ahumada Jr.
Blood Money, Patricio, well just maybe your loyalties favor south of the Rio Grand, NOT the U.S.A.
9 posted on
10/27/2007 10:37:48 AM PDT by
zerosix
(Native Sunflower)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
"I think it's blood money, bribery," said Brownsville Mayor Patricio M. Ahumada Jr.Nah. Call it a newly-discovered cultural appreciation of the Mexican practice of mortida.
14 posted on
10/27/2007 10:43:31 AM PDT by
dorothy
( “The firm basis of government is justice, not pity.” —Woodrow Wilson)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
The argument that the government can do nothing is a lot of BS.They can use the “immanent domain” option if they choose to, like a 50 foot path from one end to the other of the disputed land.
15 posted on
10/27/2007 10:51:41 AM PDT by
ANGGAPO
(LayteGulfBeachClub)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Well since these ‘landowners’ are so opposed to keeping illegals out, let them pay my taxes that support the illegals.
Sounds fair to me.
17 posted on
10/27/2007 10:58:40 AM PDT by
sheana
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Is the opposition to the fence because they will lose access to the water?
Before jumping to big govt. taking from citizens (eminent domain) or making negative comments about a whole group of people (surname reference) maybe a little analysis of why there is opposition should take place. Aren’t those on the border the most vulnerable and shouldn't they be the first to support a fence?
21 posted on
10/27/2007 11:17:06 AM PDT by
wmfights
(LUKE 9:49-50 , MARK 9:38-41)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Benavides, a lifelong resident of Roma, said residents and local governments may eventually lose their battle against the fence, but they plan to keep fighting. State officials, including Republican Gov. Rick Perry, also oppose plans to build the fence. Next, these guys will want to give back the Alamo. :-(
23 posted on
10/27/2007 11:21:33 AM PDT by
calcowgirl
("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
I have been down there, along the Rio Grande in south texas is 95% latino. The Latino power is big The land is probably owned by them for a couple of generations now, it’s Mexico for all practically purpose. Thats why the refusal to allow a fence. Its too late, critical mass has been reached years ago.
24 posted on
10/27/2007 11:25:49 AM PDT by
modican
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Have the landowners never heard of eminent domain? That is the next step, and a legitimate use of the government’s power. A step towards national defense, if you will.
That is opposed to the local (New Jersey) situation in which communities are trying to take well located properties to enable larger tax ratables to be built.
25 posted on
10/27/2007 11:25:57 AM PDT by
JimRed
("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW!)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Phuque 'em ...
EMMINENT DOMAIN
26 posted on
10/27/2007 11:31:04 AM PDT by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Congress has authorized $1.2 billion to build 700 miles of fencing along the U.S.-Mexico border. The project includes about 330 miles of so-called virtual fence - a network of cameras, high-tech sensors, radar and other technology. The remaining sections, primarily in urban areas are expected to have an actual fence. About 70 miles of actual fence is planned in South Texas.
Bush... we voted for a warrior, and we got a NWO idiot who lacks the guts and common sense to defend our border. Our "virtual fence" sections should only be virtual in one sense: that they are made up of labels that say "THIS END TOWARDS ENEMY".
29 posted on
10/27/2007 11:44:35 AM PDT by
snowrip
(Liberal? YOU ARE A SOCIALIST WITH NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT.)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
"You are talking about land that Texans and Americans shed blood for to keep," he said. When did that ever matter?
34 posted on
10/27/2007 12:19:59 PM PDT by
unixfox
(The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Use the eminent domain law. Isn't that why the Supremes passed that law, or is that just for things that the government really wants to build?
36 posted on
10/27/2007 12:24:52 PM PDT by
NRA2BFree
(Some elected people are alive only because it's illegal to kill them!!!)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
These guys need to go back to their country of origin and Bush needs to quit attacking American citizens with bizzare ways to not build the fence.
44 posted on
10/27/2007 12:48:25 PM PDT by
freekitty
((May the eagles long fly our beautiful and free American sky.))
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Build the fence everywhere except these disputed sections. That will funnel all the illegals through those points. When these land owners and towns who have refused it have had enough and are begging for a fence charge them for it.
49 posted on
10/27/2007 1:01:14 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(This is the age of the death of reason.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson