[Dustbunny]

If after the primary it was Rudy or Hitlery, we would pick the lesser of two evils and vote for Rudy.

[FreeManWhoCan]

The impression I am getting here (FR) is that if it did come down to Rudy Vs. Hitlery, some would “stay home and cut their noses”. “Honey, where’s the knife?”

[Gandalf_The_Gray]

If after the primary it was Rudy or Hitlery, we would pick the lesser of two evils and vote for Rudy.

You are probably right, but I am getting powerfully sick and tired of the "evil of two leaser's"!

Someday, before I die, I'd like to see this country reign in spending and start shrinking social programs.

Regards,
GtG

[Ol' Sparky]

If after the primary it was Rudy or Hitlery, we would pick the lesser of two evils and vote for Rudy.

Giuliani is the greater of two evils and would do FAR more damage to conservatism and the Republican party than Hillary Clinton.

Moving the GOP to the left, leaving the nation with no hope for conservative President until 2016 and leaving the GOP no chance of taking back Congress for a decade is far worse than four years of Hillary, which is guaranteed to spur another conservative revolution.

[stockstrader]

If after the primary it was Rudy or Hitlery, we would pick the lesser of two evils and vote for Rudy.

I am personally sick and tired of this 'lesser of two evils' crap (pardon my French).

A Rudy vs. Hillary match is this simple.

Candidate A -- Unacceptable.

Candidate B -- More unacceptable.

The operative word above is UNACCEPTABLE. No thanks on either of the above.